Editor in Chief Bill | 15 Jan 2011 1:10 p.m. PST |
Which rulesets reached their peak of popularity in 2010, and have now begun the slow (or not so slow
) slide to 'nobody plays that anymore'? |
Scorpio | 15 Jan 2011 1:29 p.m. PST |
Isn't it too early to tell? I mean, anything that peaked last year might just be hitting a lull before getting even bigger this year. |
aecurtis | 15 Jan 2011 1:40 p.m. PST |
GW/Warhammer Historical pretty much slammed the door on Warhammer Ancient Battles with the incompetemtly produced WAB 2.0 and the decision to switch to direct sales only. So not a slow slide, but a swift "swoosh" off the cliff. The only thing left is the screaming, until WAB hits bottom. Allen |
Waco Joe | 15 Jan 2011 3:02 p.m. PST |
|
Wargamer Blue | 15 Jan 2011 3:06 p.m. PST |
|
Dave Crowell | 15 Jan 2011 3:13 p.m. PST |
WAB jumped the shark for sure. Hard to call this year a "peak". |
50 Dylan CDs and an Icepick | 15 Jan 2011 3:15 p.m. PST |
How on earth would we know any of this
other than just the anecdotal: "At my club we played a lot of "The Glory of Glory" last year, but not so much now" ? |
WarDepotDavid | 15 Jan 2011 3:47 p.m. PST |
|
AndrewGPaul | 15 Jan 2011 4:23 p.m. PST |
Well, in my experience so far, every ruleset ever written, with the exception of MERCS, has so far failed to be as popular this year as it was last year. Mind you, my gaming so far this year has consisted of one game of MERCS. |
FredNoris | 15 Jan 2011 4:29 p.m. PST |
|
doug redshirt | 15 Jan 2011 5:07 p.m. PST |
|
The Beast Rampant | 15 Jan 2011 5:17 p.m. PST |
"Critter Commandos" Oh-kay! Maybe 'cause there's been no new critters in ages? If CC was going into 2011 1/1000th as popular as WH40K, I'd be happy. |
Pierce Inverarity | 15 Jan 2011 5:59 p.m. PST |
Flames of War. I say this even though I'm getting into it. No bile, just cold analysis. Consider: Normandy Sexy Tigers = done. Blitzkrieg Pz IIIs = anticlimactic. Pacific War = not going to happen, on account of too much jungle (= not enough sexy tanks, not that there are any around); and besides no one wants to play the Japanese. What is there left to do? Normandy 2.0, which will sell one third of 1.0. Normandy Weird, ditto. FoW WWI and Interwar, ditto. |
SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER | 15 Jan 2011 6:09 p.m. PST |
|
Pierce Inverarity | 15 Jan 2011 6:22 p.m. PST |
|
Sysiphus | 15 Jan 2011 6:34 p.m. PST |
|
aecurtis | 15 Jan 2011 6:47 p.m. PST |
Good argument, Pierce. Allen |
aecurtis | 15 Jan 2011 8:08 p.m. PST |
Jumped the Crocodile, as I've mentioned elsewhere. Allen |
Katzbalger | 15 Jan 2011 8:34 p.m. PST |
I know FOW is on the downward spiral 'cause I just bought my rules last month. Rob |
Editor my Arse | 15 Jan 2011 10:58 p.m. PST |
I think Tractics is just about to get it's second wind. What it really needs is a marketing svengali. There was a chap who popped up on here last year who seemed to have the werewithall, Greg someone. Pits? Potts? Anyway he seemed like a real go getter, just the sort you need to set a fire under the market. |
raylev3 | 15 Jan 2011 11:32 p.m. PST |
Like others, I believe WAB has now outlived its usefulness. |
Shardik | 16 Jan 2011 3:59 a.m. PST |
|
leidang | 16 Jan 2011 1:55 p.m. PST |
|
Goldwyrm | 16 Jan 2011 3:09 p.m. PST |
I'd agree with FoG, FoW, and WAB. I'd add Warmachine and D&D 4E. Of course one could make the peaked argument with just about any set of rules more than a year old, the way many gamers are with rules, myself included. |
ancientsgamer | 16 Jan 2011 11:56 p.m. PST |
FoG hasn't peaked as FoGR will draw folks to both periods. FoW hasn't peaked yet either as early war is still bringing interest and they keep releasing more Late War. The "codex" mania is quite frustrating to me though. I don't agree about the Pacific War being tankless either, more rare for the Japanese but people seem to forget that U.S. Army units were present in the Pacific too. Also, don't forget about China, the Philipines, Burma, etc. Lots of possibilities come to mind. There are plenty of players that would play Japanese; I would. Look how many play Axis now. Can't speak to WAB but they do have a history of messing up perfectly fine rules or releasing the next "codex" that renders the latest army "the best"; at least on the 40K and the fantasy side. Until the economy improves, I wouldn't say anything has peaked yet. |
Gwydion | 17 Jan 2011 5:02 a.m. PST |
Until the economy improves everything has peaked. |
Warbeads | 17 Jan 2011 5:08 p.m. PST |
Fer Sure, Dude! Gracias, Glenn |
Farstar | 17 Jan 2011 6:10 p.m. PST |
I'd agree with FoG, FoW, and WAB. I'd add Warmachine and D&D 4E. D&D4e is a clear leader for the "Peaked in 2010" award, given the rather lackluster set of products announced for 2011. 5e here we come! Warmachine had a hot year in 2010, but "peaked" means "all down hill from here" which I don't think is going to be the case with them. FoG is a good bet, but FoW peaked in 2009, and WAB's peak was around 2006-7. Uncharted Seas may have peaked last year, but we just got a new rulebook, so it may have more life in it than you suspect. I suspect Firestorm Armada DID peak in 2010, however, and 2011 will be the year for Dystopian Wars. Other candidates include Infinity and Malifaux, though I think Infinity peaked in 2009 and Malifaux's peak year is going to be 2011, on the basis that the small skirmish games have a 2-4 year cycle before being replaced in the queue by new shiny. AT-43 peaked in 2008, and the collection of games under the name "Confrontation" peaked in 2005-6. |
richarDISNEY | 18 Jan 2011 12:02 p.m. PST |
D&D 4th ed. Uncharted Seas is another good one
|