Help support TMP


" Iranian radar-evading flying boats." Topic


63 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board

Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2011) Message Board

Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

The Clash of Armor


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

20mm U.S. Army Specialists, Episode 4

Another episode of Identity That Figure!


Featured Workbench Article


Featured Profile Article


Current Poll


4,320 hits since 28 Sep 2010
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.

Pages: 1 2 

archstanton7301 Oct 2010 4:52 p.m. PST

Well ideas have to start somewhere…Also you say Phalanx/Radar etc etc would make them easy prey but what happenned with USS Stark????…caught napping even though they KNEW where the Iraqi attack jet was!!
Ekranoplans are very effective vehicles--They move close enough to the sea to be lost in the clutter of the sea for anti air radar and are too fast moving for surface search radar..
While yes these do look a bit like micro-lite ekranoplans didn't the German Panzers also start with Pz1 tin cans?????

Goose66603 Oct 2010 8:30 a.m. PST

Remember gentleman with atomic material.. one only requires a fanatic ready to die for their cause and for them to get close!

A dirty bomb may not send ships to the bottom, but it renders them un-usable permenantly!

Whilst we are on the fantasy's of flight.. ;)

Kaoschallenged07 Feb 2012 12:15 p.m. PST

Since Tango had to bring the subject up again.

link

Robert

Kaoschallenged07 Feb 2012 1:21 p.m. PST

And the response from the USS Ponce :) LOL. Robert

youtu.be/lCZbw1KJ568

Mako1107 Feb 2012 2:51 p.m. PST

Actually, I don't think so.

If I recall correctly, most modern warships are designed to operate in a NBC environment, if they need to.

They'd just need to hose the ship off, and then continue on merrily on their way.

Kaoschallenged08 Feb 2012 12:12 a.m. PST

So true Mako. Now of course if they ever got a bomb small enough that wouldn't sink the boat ;)? Robert

I did like comments from this 2010 article when they were unveiled. Robert


"Iran's Sacred Week of Defense (celebrating its eight-year resistance to the Iraqi invation of the 1980s) is never without a healthy dose of pomp and ceremony, but this week Iran's defense ministry took the usual military parade to the waterfront. Yesterday Iran unveiled three squadrons of machine-gun-wielding flying boats. Yeah, you read that correctly.

The Bavar 2 is an ocean-going craft meant to pack surveillance cameras, an automatic weapon, and perhaps even missiles. Though it's unclear exactly what it's supposed to defend against. And it's also supposed to be "stealth," presumably because if flies so low – just above the water, as far as we can tell – that it rolls under the radar.

It's fast, however, and it could be employed in the Iranian Navy's favorite game: harassing everyone else with a vessel afloat in the Persian Gulf. For that it might be ideal, darting quickly and menacingly around other larger naval vessels it has no intention of or capability for attacking.

So why spend the money? To quote Iranian Defense Minister Brig. Gen. Ahmad Vahidi's statement to the press: "Islamic Republic of Iran is one of the few countries which managed to design, build and use flying boats in a short time." Which is true. Sorry DARPA, but you've been bested. Time to wind down your flying boat program."
link

Lion in the Stars08 Feb 2012 12:57 a.m. PST

Might be a little more impressive if the toys could carry a weapon capable of harming a ship.

Kaoschallenged08 Feb 2012 3:54 p.m. PST

True like the article points out "darting quickly and menacingly around other larger naval vessels it has no intention of or capability for attacking." LOL. Robert

Kaoschallenged14 Feb 2012 5:30 p.m. PST

These would be a more credible threat. Robert

picture

picture

Grizzlymc14 Feb 2012 6:38 p.m. PST

50 cal on the bridge wings would pull them down pretty fast.

Kaoschallenged15 Feb 2012 9:17 p.m. PST

Like I posted earlier about the USS Ponce.wink thumbs up Robert

youtu.be/lCZbw1KJ568

Pages: 1 2 

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.