Help support TMP


"Numidians and Moors?" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Charioteer


Rating: gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Little Lost Dinosaur

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian discovers a lost dinosaur.


2,177 hits since 16 Jul 2010
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

RelliK16 Jul 2010 8:34 a.m. PST

Whats the difference in appearance between Numidians and Moors?

Can anybody give me some insight?

Thanks,
Mike

CooperSteveOnTheLaptop16 Jul 2010 8:38 a.m. PST

Numidians were Caucasian, Moors were negroid

lugal hdan16 Jul 2010 9:58 a.m. PST

Numidians are Berbers.

Moors were North African Muslims who invaded Spain. They were originally Berbers, but Arabs and Black Africans were also called "Moors" by Europeans.

People mostly use the term "Moors" for Medieval Spainish/Andalusian types, and Numidians for Classical Era Berbers, like those who fought in the Punic Wars.

I'd give Moors more "Arab Conquest" era looking clothes (whites and tans, robes and maybe turbans) and Numidians simple brownish wool garments.

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Jul 2010 9:59 a.m. PST

Yes and no – "Moor" has been used as a catch-all for all manner of groups over the centuries, so Moors could be similar to Numidians in appearance (ie. Berbers) or could be coloured (ie. Almoravids from Nigeria etc.) or even Arabic, amongst others.

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP16 Jul 2010 10:00 a.m. PST

Oops, my post was in response to Steve – looks like lugal hdan and I were simultyping….

Caesar16 Jul 2010 10:12 a.m. PST

For ancients, none.
link

Mulopwepaul16 Jul 2010 10:22 a.m. PST

Numidians were a subset of the groups who would become known as Moors. The usage of "Moor" is so broad as to be almost useless, but is generally used, as noted, to refer to African Muslims of the Reconquista period generally. And, of course, most people falling under the heading of "Moor" were not Negroid--modern Berbers and modern Spaniards are genetically almost indistinguishable.

aecurtis Fezian16 Jul 2010 10:26 a.m. PST

In classical times, Numidians and Moors (Mauri) were cousins: both Berber (Amazigh) peoples, with a great deal of interaction between the ruling houses. At one point, King Juba of Numidia simply crossed the border and became King Juba of Mauretania.

The Negroid association doesn't come until later, when black slaves were brought in, both westward from eastern Africa, and northward across the western Sahara, by mostly Arab traders. Due to the presence of blacks in North Africa and al Andalus, especially because of the large-scale use as slave-soldiers, Europeans became confused. The original designation of the Mauri as "black" does not mean they were Negroid. As we've said before, think Zinedine Zidane, not Denzel Washington.

The establishment and recognition of the later Numidian and Moorish kingdoms was a bit of an artificial distinction inflicted by Rome partly (first) as a reward to their Numidian allies after the Punic wars, partly (later) to split up the Berber realms when fractious or to reward good (ally) behavior, and finally to bring them under direct Romand control.

Yes, it's Wikipedia, but it's a good summary:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numidia

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mauretania

Allen

aecurtis Fezian16 Jul 2010 10:29 a.m. PST

For figure design purposes, up until becoming Roman provinces, Numidian and Mooorish appearance would be practically identical and seems to have experienced little change over time.

As we've discussed before, some of the artifacts we use as clues to Carthaginian arms and armor are actually Numidian in origin.

Allen

aecurtis Fezian16 Jul 2010 10:34 a.m. PST

It's interesting that in turn, the Amazigh call Westerners "Romans"!

link

jdeleonardis16 Jul 2010 11:34 a.m. PST

No, Im sorry…The Moops….The Moops

thabear16 Jul 2010 2:43 p.m. PST

I found in parts of Sth Italy , people from Nth Africa are still referred to as "Moors" and it doesn't refer to colour of skin but from place of origin.

Tom

RelliK16 Jul 2010 3:24 p.m. PST

Thanks all and especially you Allen. I can see you make alot of effort here on TMP.

Thanks again!

I'll sculpt them like the ones on Trajans column basically caucasion with frizzy/curly hair.

Mike

goragrad16 Jul 2010 5:31 p.m. PST

Interestingly the term blackamoor, which is presumed to be a compound of black and moor, dates to the 16th century (1547?). It appears from this that the English of the time felt a need to differentiate between 'Moors' based on skin color.

The term apparently degenerated over time into a slang/derogatory term for blacks in general.

Mulopwepaul16 Jul 2010 6:06 p.m. PST

Given the number of Englishmen who passed through the Barbary slave casernes, it's not surprising that further distinctions were made.

CooperSteveOnTheLaptop17 Jul 2010 8:40 a.m. PST

Yeah I confess to over-simplifying. hOWEVER Othello is a 'coal-black Moor' or similar in Shakespeare, many references show he's supposed to be really dark skinned not just a bit mediterranean looking. Not that the Bard's opus is the last word on anthropology

Mulopwepaul18 Jul 2010 12:01 p.m. PST

Othello is pretty clearly meant to be Negroid, but most people apprehended by the term "Moor" in its most common usage were not--the general pre-modern tendency was to call sub-Saharan Negroid tribes "Ethiops" or "Ethiopians." "Moor" was for Maghrebi Muslims in general, regardless of origin--hence the need for "blackamoor."

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.