
"The fantasy of 60mm basing" Topic
57 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Pages: 1 2
Diocletian284 | 15 Nov 2015 6:15 a.m. PST |
This is a problem I have faced with my 28mm Late Imperial Romans. I cannot get four on a 60mm base and have it fit right or look too cramped. Tom Thomas makes a good point about cavalry. My 28mm cataphract cavalry fit much better on a base 80mm wide and 50mm deep. I can at least get three on a base that size. This does create a problem for DBA like Tom mentions with recoil being base depth. 50mm deep would make too large a recoil for the cataphracts for the rules as written. That is one reason of several reasons why I gravitate more to other games for 28mm like Impetus, Hail Caesar, and ADLG. They do not have recoil like DBA, but rather take fatigue or hit points to reflect casualties. |
MajorB | 15 Nov 2015 8:32 a.m. PST |
This does create a problem for DBA like Tom mentions with recoil being base depth. 50mm deep would make too large a recoil for the cataphracts for the rules as written. If you use bases that are deeper than normal in DBA, just put a mark on one edge of the base to show what the base depth SHOULD be and use that as a guide. |
Bandolier | 15 Nov 2015 6:16 p.m. PST |
I now use 60mmx30mm and the extra depth makes all the difference. I like the look of tightly ranked heavy infantry and the contrasting looser 3 or 2 figure stands. The same with cavalry, I've gone with 60mmx50mm to accommodate 28mm mounted figures. |
BigRedBat  | 16 Nov 2015 2:24 a.m. PST |
I also go 60 or 70mm deep for mounted. I find that the extra depth really improves the amination of the unit and also protects the vulnerable paint on the horses' noses and tails.
All of my infantry are deeper-based too, except pikemen. I like them to be massed closely together. |
Dexter Ward | 16 Nov 2015 3:02 a.m. PST |
If you can't fit four figures on a base, just put 3 on. The number of figures per base doesn't affect game play at all in DBx (or indeed FoG); it's just an aid to identifying troop types. The only rules where you count figures these days are WAB and its descendants (CoE and WaC), and they don't use multi-basing anyway. |
Thomas Thomas | 16 Nov 2015 2:46 p.m. PST |
Dio284: In DBA 3.0 mounted can recoil up to 60mm (a base width). Offically you can mount them on 45mm deep bases (the size of the bases that come with Perry miniatures). But mounting them as deep as 60mm makes very little difference in game play. Getting the Recoil mechanic rather than tedious marker counters is well worth the effort. If you can't fit 4 Romans on a 60mm base – do as I do (and 3.0 allows) just put 3 on the base. TomT |
Diocletian284 | 16 Nov 2015 4:05 p.m. PST |
TomT. Thanks for the clarification. Good to know. |
Pages: 1 2
|