Help support TMP


"Question of a miniature's base/bottom" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Sculpting Message Board

Back to the SF Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

General
Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Cheap Scenery: Giant Mossy Rocks

Well, they're certainly cheap...


Featured Profile Article


Current Poll


1,415 hits since 7 Jul 2010
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

28mmMan07 Jul 2010 6:56 p.m. PST

While working on a miniature I am at the point where I am stuck with what to do with the base/underside.

Normally a miniature is slot-a-base or molded footprint (base), but mine is a ground hugger like this picture so do I sculpt an underside and make it harder to cast or put it on a base and fill any voids for the casting ease?

I like the idea of being able to put it on what ever base the gamer would like to, but that said does it matter?

Better to have a complete miniature just because or mold in the base.

If a base, the shape becomes important.

Working on a 15mm and a 28mm version, if that helps.

SECURITY MINISTER CRITTER07 Jul 2010 7:17 p.m. PST

I would try both, and then produce the easiest. Also, why do you have to sculpt an underside??????????????
Once based, it won't be seen anyway(i.e.micro armor)!

Mark Plant07 Jul 2010 7:19 p.m. PST

No base so long as the critter is fairly big.

It is easy to add one, if that is what you want, but almost impossible to remove one you don't want.

I have not bought models in the past because of the built in bases.

(Small critters can have a base if they are otherwise too small to hold easily. Say a Star Wars mouse droid. Such bases should be as thin as easily achieveable.)

Mulopwepaul07 Jul 2010 10:51 p.m. PST

It's always bottoms with you Americans, isn't it?

Warbeads08 Jul 2010 5:20 a.m. PST

No, some of us like "tops" too.

Gracias,

Glenn

28mmMan08 Jul 2010 8:50 a.m. PST

The desire to sculpt the bottom is in the nature of "finishing" the piece.

More so I was thinking a minimal close cropped flat bottom or a molded base.

I am leaning towards minimal bottom.

Lion in the Stars08 Jul 2010 11:51 a.m. PST

I'd suggest a base as thin as reasonably castable or a non-base (filled-in void).

Why shred molds unless you absolutely have to?

28mmMan08 Jul 2010 11:55 a.m. PST

That is the voice of reason that has been knocking about in my head :)

Mehoy Nehoy08 Jul 2010 5:02 p.m. PST

For what it's worth, I like the underside of a mini to be sculpted too. That way I have the option of making a 'dead' version.

28mmMan08 Jul 2010 7:18 p.m. PST

I have been giving it some thought. In the case of a dead marker it may be better to covert an existing miniature and then mold a dead version.

I would prefer to make a bottom but it makes more sense to provide a minimal flush to the body base at this point…easy to base as the gamer chooses, and if someone desired to fill in small details to make a dead version or other.

Thanks for the input all! :)

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.