Editor in Chief Bill | 01 Jul 2010 6:46 p.m. PST |
First Empire magazine has a wonderful profile of Blucher in its latest issue. Which leads me to wonder – who was the best Prussian general? |
Sparker | 01 Jul 2010 7:49 p.m. PST |
Alt Vorwarts himself! 'Raise High the Black flags Children! And I'll shoot the first man who shows any mercy!" Mind you they had no shortage of talent. However Blucher was not only strategically and tactically clever, he was also Brave and modest. And modesty in a senor officer is a rare trait! When the Royal Academy in London wanted to award him a Doctorate, he said they should in that case make Gneisenau a Pharmaicst, as he made the pills that he, Blucher, administered to the frogs! Kind Regards, Sparker |
troopwo | 01 Jul 2010 8:09 p.m. PST |
Papa Vorwarts deserves praise. |
JCBJCB | 01 Jul 2010 8:57 p.m. PST |
Frederick William, hands down. He presided over both the dismantling of the decrepit army of Frederick and the introduction of the age of Moltke. :) |
vtsaogames | 01 Jul 2010 9:21 p.m. PST |
Take Blucher out of 1813 and Napoleon probably wins. Same for 1814, 1815. |
pavelft | 01 Jul 2010 9:29 p.m. PST |
|
Uesugi Kenshin | 02 Jul 2010 3:19 a.m. PST |
|
summerfield | 02 Jul 2010 6:02 a.m. PST |
This is an interesting comment, in the 1813-15 period then it is General Staff System Blucher and Scharnhorst Blucher and Gneisnau It was the combination. Blucher said at a dinner in 1815 that he was the only man to be able to kiss his own brains. He got up and kissed Gneisnau on his forhead. I would add that von Yorck was probably the most talented of the generals with von Bulow for his defence of Berlin in 1813. Stephen |
Old Slow Trot | 02 Jul 2010 6:42 a.m. PST |
Yorck. Beethoven even wrote a march for him. |
10th Marines | 02 Jul 2010 8:29 a.m. PST |
I would agree that without Blucher, the campaigns of 1813 and 1815, and perhaps 1815 would have been lost. As for the best Prussian general, however, I would pick Yorck-cantankerous, insubordinate, touch, and very smart. An excellent tactician and leader of men. Sincerely, K |
10th Marines | 02 Jul 2010 8:39 a.m. PST |
There was no 'general staff system' in 1813-1815. The Prussian general staff was in a very embryonic form during that period and would not grow into what it later became until after the great wars. The Prussian general staff was inferior to the French general staff throughout the period. It did not function as well or as efficiently as the French system, as created by Berthier, et al. Sincerey, K |
summerfield | 02 Jul 2010 1:31 p.m. PST |
Dear Kevin Interesting comments. No doudt you have read the writings of Clausewitz, Gneisnau, Scharnhorst, Humbolt, Bulow etc
You may come to a different conclusion. Well we differ upon this. Stephen |
10th Marines | 02 Jul 2010 2:48 p.m. PST |
I'm not a fan of the Prussian and later German staff system. All staff sections were made subordinate to the operations section which was a basic fault. And the German system failed miserably in two World Wars-Germany has never won a war. The Prussian system that was developing from 1807-1815 was not as efficient as the French system. It later became an efficient army staff but its inherent shortcomings would become evident after 1871. Sincerely, K |
Regards | 02 Jul 2010 8:28 p.m. PST |
I too would say Blucher for being so tenacious. He lost multiple battles in 1814, largely with Russian troops, and eventually came back for more. As an aside, is Kliest (Prussian Corps commander under Schwarzenburg) regarded as a poor officer? I seem to recall reading that he was very timid, but must confess, I don't know if I've actually had a chance to read anything about him. Erik |
Field Marshal | 05 Jul 2010 9:16 p.m. PST |
Who couldnt like Blucher? Everything oyu want in a general, aggressive and eccentric with a real concern for his "children"
i like Yorck as well
|
By John 54 | 06 Jul 2010 1:20 p.m. PST |
Something something something, dark side, something something something, French best at everything, something something etc, zzzzzzz |
gilesosborne | 06 Jul 2010 1:33 p.m. PST |
10th Marines, hummmm, "never won a war"
how about the Franco-Prussian war then!!! |
gilesosborne | 06 Jul 2010 1:34 p.m. PST |
Gneisenau
..amateurs talk tactics, professionals talk logistics
|
jammy four | 06 Jul 2010 3:03 p.m. PST |
the Queen of Prussia for inspiration alone
|
10th Marines | 06 Jul 2010 3:13 p.m. PST |
In the Franco-Prussian War Prussia was still Prussia. It wasn't until after the war that the German Empire was proclaimed in Versailles. During the war it was still divided up into different states with different monarchs. Sincerely, K |
10th Marines | 06 Jul 2010 3:15 p.m. PST |
When did Gneisenau talk logistics? He was a chief of staff and a staff officer-not a logistician. And he wanted to be so very desperately a combat commander which is why he ignored his duties as chief of staff after Waterloo and tried to lead a pursuit. Sincerely, K |
10th Marines | 06 Jul 2010 3:15 p.m. PST |
Queen Louise led her country into a national disaster. She should have kept her mouth shut. Sincerely, K |
50 Dylan CDs and an Icepick | 06 Jul 2010 6:56 p.m. PST |
["And the German system failed miserably in two World Wars-Germany has never won a war."] 1. Although it was Kevin who changed the subject from "Prussian" to "German," so he could roll out his second-favorite national bias *
Everyone (even Kevin) knows that the Franco-Prussian war was fought between the French on one side, and a coalition of German states on the other side. It was obviously "the Germans" on one side, and they won. So you can't have it both ways. Either the Prussian staff system was good enough for the Prussians to win the FPW
or you'll have to admit that the "Germans" won a war. 2. It seems a bit silly to extend the idea of the "Prussian General Staff system" all the way to 1945, since Hitler altered the apparatus of command almost from his first year in power, and continued to alter it in dramatic ways, but if you're going to insist on including it in the example, then it seems rather obvious that the Germans beat the snot out of their opponents from 1939-41, and that the big, war-losing decisions they made were not made by a general staff, but rather by an insane dictator. 3. Or, if you'd prefer logical consistency (I'm not optimistic, but hope springs eternal), then we can agree to use your argument and say that the Germans ultimately lost WW2 – proving that their system was bad
and obviously Napoleon ultimately lost the Napoleonic Wars – which must prove that his was bad, too. 4. As for the German system "failing miserably" in World War 1, one has to wonder, then, how they managed to hold off enemies who outnumbered them more than 3:2 on multiple fronts, while defeating one of those enemies utterly (Russia), and ultimately going down to defeat only against overwhelming material and financial disadvantages and a four-year blockade. * any minute now we're going to get the "
when they hear the sound of a drumbeat
" quote. I don't think I could get through the season without it, so don't let me down.
|
Ulenspiegel | 29 Jul 2010 12:07 p.m. PST |
"Großmutter, warum hast du so scharfe Zähne?" "Damit ich KK besser beißen kann" |
10th Marines | 30 Jul 2010 2:10 p.m. PST |
Those teeth aren't sharp-they're rather dull quite like the 'wit' behind them. ;-) Sincerely, K |
Old Bear | 31 Jul 2010 1:28 p.m. PST |
Location Zambia
near Liechtenstein, no doubt. |
10th Marines | 31 Jul 2010 1:46 p.m. PST |
Probably closer to Namby-Pamby Land. Have you seen that new Geico commercial with the unsympathetic psychiatrist? Sincerely, K |
Old Bear | 01 Aug 2010 2:05 p.m. PST |
Unfortunately I don't think we will get that commercial in the UK. |
10th Marines | 01 Aug 2010 3:43 p.m. PST |
That's too bad-you'd love this commercial. Sincerely, K |
Emperador Carlos | 02 Aug 2010 11:33 a.m. PST |
Is everyone forgetting 'Ol Brunswick? He was awesome.
|
10th Marines | 02 Aug 2010 2:02 p.m. PST |
Especially at Auerstadt in 1806-simply superb. He also started a family tradition of being shot by the French. His son continued the tradition at Quatre Bras. His performance at Valmy in 1792 was equally outstanding. Sincerely, K |