Just become aware of this thread!
I think we are all looking for a good book giving nice coverage of the a.m. period, but I am also aware of the fact that I'm not the real expert for it.
That means a lot more time to invest in combing the primary sources, which I don't have presently.
It is not easy to write about the imperial army in its early days, as regulations were sketchy at best, and authors have to rely on "comments" quite often.
Most guys courageous enough to try and tackle the task end up "skinned alive", and I would second Dave if he asks not to be too harsh.
Very few Osprey titles can claim to be "perfect" (brackets intentional as I know perfection to be out of this world), and I don't think they are aiming at such a goal at all. Of course I'm not suggesting that "anything goes" either, but periods poorly covered with evidence should generally deserve a little more leniency IMHO.
I am aware that I'm listed in the acknowledgements for critical reading, and I succeeded in "disarming" a few highly controversial issues, but Vlado was also operating from sources I didn't have, and is thus perfectly entitled to his views and opinions as he is the author.
Given the difficulty of the task (often fragmentary information, language problems and Osprey limitations) I can only admire the courage of people who venture into this.
Now I can find people who denigrate Vlado's books in comparison to Breszinski's, while Richard was heavily bashed for his books before. Needless to point out that in general the swedish side is even better documented.
I certainly won't say that everything is just fine in Vlado's books, but the basic information is mainly correct, and constructive critics are helping to clarify the minor errors.
While this MAA might not be worth buying for some, this goes for nearly all Osprey titles, doesn't it.
For someone starting off on the period, it provides a basis upon which each and everyone can enlarge his knowledge if he deems it interesting enough or necessary.
Cheers
Romain