Help support TMP


"New Scenario - The 'NorMons' Battlegroup" Topic


8 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Scenarios Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

FUBAR


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article

Normandy on the Game Table

Finally, a game that's not so flat.


Featured Book Review


1,012 hits since 16 Mar 2010
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Jemima Fawr16 Mar 2010 11:20 a.m. PST

Following on the heels of the recent Broehuizen scenario, the 3rd Monmouths get another run out in this superb new scenario from Bry Barnard:

PDF link

This scenario follows the events of the Battle of Pavee/Sourdevalles, at the southern tip of Operation 'Bluecoat', in Normandy, August 1944. 11th Armoured Division formed a combined battlegroup from remnants of the Norfolks and Monmouths (unofficially titled the 'NorMons' Group), which was then ordered to hold high ground just south of the village of Pavee (a few miles to the east of the town of Vire). This position was then subjected to a very strong counter-attack from elements of 10. SS Panzer-Division 'Frundsberg', stiffened by Tigers from Schwere-SS-Panzer-Abteilung 102.

Bry's uncle actually fought in this battle and considered it to be the hardest battle the 3rd Monmouths ever fought in WW2.

aecurtis Fezian16 Mar 2010 1:37 p.m. PST

Very nice; good use of Google Earth!

I know that you know that it's *Loyd* Carrier, so I won't mention it.

Allen

fred12df16 Mar 2010 1:50 p.m. PST

Looks good Mark (as usual!)

Would it be possible to re-do the PDF as the images have come out quite low resolution and are quite hard to make out?

Jemima Fawr16 Mar 2010 6:13 p.m. PST

Allen,

That would be my fault, as he's probably cut'n'pasted old charts of mine from the days before I knew better… That said, it's not our fault if Mr Lloyd didn't know how to spell his own name! ;o)

I agree re Google Earth – a good choice in this instance, as that part of Normandy has changed very little since 1944 (which can't be said for a lot of battlefields in Normandy). These days I almost always use google Earth as a starting point for my own maps.

Fred,

Bry has made a 'full-fat' version available from another link. Jim the webmaster sadly has to cut the files down to the bare bones (to roughly 200k) in order to reduce bandwidth. I'll find that link for you, or you could simply go to the forum at fireandfury.com

Cheers,

Mark

Jemima Fawr16 Mar 2010 6:15 p.m. PST

Here's that link (I've no idea how it works though):

PDF link

The forum thread is here:

link

aercdr16 Mar 2010 8:32 p.m. PST

Thanks. I've saved the information to use with my newly painted up Valiant Brits and Germans. I will have to substitute Churchills for Shermans, however. What's a guy to do?

fred12df17 Mar 2010 12:33 p.m. PST

Cheers Mark that full fat version is much clearer.

Jemima Fawr09 Nov 2010 8:40 a.m. PST

I've since visited the battlefield and taken lots of photos of the ground, which has changed very little since 1944. I've therefore started another thread here:

TMP link

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.