"New 1/1200 "Never Were" DDs" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board
Areas of Interest19th Century
World War One
World War Two at Sea
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Another four villagers from the Romanian set by Blue Moon.
Featured Workbench Article combatpainter  has been watching some documentaries lately set in the Western Desert, and was inspired to create this...
Featured Profile Article Not just a footnote in history, here's a song about the Tripartite Fleet!
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| ptdockyard | 14 Mar 2010 1:37 p.m. PST |
Fruits of the little bit of downtime I had on my recent Asia trip! SL-11 USN 1919 Destroyer Design(5-5"/51, 12-21" TT, 4-18" TT)……..$8.00
SL-12 USN 1931 1500 Ton Destroyer Design (6-5"/25, 9-21" TT. Done is 1942 configuration)…$8.00 And a few from the real world: SL-13 K-XIV Dutch Submarine 1941……………………………….$4.00
SL-14 Junon Free French Submarine 1941………………………..$4.00 SL-12 can be found in Norman Friedman's book on USN destroyers Dave G
The PT Dockyard/Shangri-La Ironworks
ptdockyard.com |
| Klebert L Hall | 15 Mar 2010 6:01 a.m. PST |
Why did SL-11 propose 21" and 18" torpedoes? Were the eighteens for "snap shots" like on some British DDs?
-Kle. |
| Mal Wright | 15 Mar 2010 6:33 a.m. PST |
No no Klebert…the Big ones were for big battleships and the little ones were for little battleships!  |
| ptdockyard | 15 Mar 2010 12:13 p.m. PST |
The 18" were indeed for close in snapshots. |
|
