Deucey  | 28 Oct 2009 11:40 a.m. PST |
Should there be a board on movies? Probably not. I can't believe I just asked that question. |
| gweirda | 28 Oct 2009 11:45 a.m. PST |
ummm…there already is, right? |
| Connard Sage | 28 Oct 2009 11:46 a.m. PST |
More boards. Lovely.
Try posting your request here:
TMP link Eventually, everyone will have their own board. |
Wyatt the Odd  | 28 Oct 2009 12:15 p.m. PST |
"Eventually, everyone will have their own board." I can't see that happening. There'll be plenty of room for both you and Allen in the Bites when Provoked board even with Kyoteblue adding "Dude!" as needed. 
Wyatt |
| nazrat | 28 Oct 2009 12:24 p.m. PST |
"…even with Kyoteblue adding "Dude!" as needed." Which is actually never, in point of fact. |
| Caesar | 28 Oct 2009 12:48 p.m. PST |
I prefer the term "motion pictures". |
| darthfozzywig | 28 Oct 2009 1:13 p.m. PST |
We REALLY need separate boards for "Silent Pictures" and "Talkies". Anything short of that would be too confusing to contemplate. |
| Patrick R | 28 Oct 2009 1:26 p.m. PST |
While we are a it maybe we could have a machinima board ? BTW there is a movies board on the Plus section which deals with all the non mini related stuff. |
| RavenscraftCybernetics | 28 Oct 2009 2:37 p.m. PST |
films
cinematic adaptations
talkies
motion picture shows
each with a classic and new sub board
xposting to an inappropriate board being dawghousablle. |
| nazrat | 28 Oct 2009 3:09 p.m. PST |
"Never added or never needed?" Hell, it's ALWAYS added… |
| The Beast Rampant | 28 Oct 2009 5:22 p.m. PST |
Why would you waste time on such penny-ante nonsense when we have a 'biplane board', but no 'triplane board'?!? |
| Neotacha | 28 Oct 2009 7:55 p.m. PST |
And here is yet another example of why splitting off the boards into "message boards" and "plus boards" was a silly (and bad) idea. Deucey, look here TMP link for the movie boards. Bill should have just made all boards except perhaps the TMP Talk and General Wargaming boards 'opt-in' boards automatically, and up by the table of contents have a permanent message explaining how to select the boards one wants to view. Perhaps if folks had to click the check boxes for the things they wanted to see, rather than the things they didn't, we could all figure out how to use the check boxes the first time round. Edited twice: once for spelling and once for fabulously screwed up punctuation. |
| Connard Sage | 29 Oct 2009 1:25 a.m. PST |
Bill should have just made all boards except perhaps the TMP Talk and General Wargaming boards 'opt-in' boards automatically, and up by the table of contents have a permanent message explaining how to select the boards one wants to view. Perhaps if folks had to click the check boxes for the things they wanted to see, rather than the things they didn't, we could all figure out how to use the check boxes the first time round. Don't you mean 'opt-out'? |
| Neotacha | 29 Oct 2009 4:30 a.m. PST |
No. They are opt-out boards now. If you don't want to see them, you have un-check the box. I think they should all be unchecked until the viewer goes in and deliberately checks them off. |
| Deucey | 29 Oct 2009 10:01 a.m. PST |
Wow. I have learned so much. (I thought checking meant I wanted it – Mystery Solved!) I'm glad I posted this question now!!! |
| gweirda | 29 Oct 2009 11:05 a.m. PST |
less than 24-hours… If I could learn so much in so little time, I would be so much happier…
ps- not meant to be sarcastic: I really do admire/envy the courage to learn.
|
