![The Miniatures Page logo](tmpshead.jpg)
"ACW Sash and Saber 40mm diorama build review " Topic
15 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Dioramas Message Board Back to the Wargaming in Australia Message Board Back to the ACW Product Reviews Message Board Back to the ACW Painting Guides Message Board Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board Back to the ACW Gallery Message Board
Action Log
19 Oct 2009 7:51 a.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "ACW Sash and Saber 40 mm dio build review " to "ACW Sash and Saber 40mm diorama build review "
Areas of InterestGeneral American Civil War
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article![USRC Reliance](showcase/acwshowcase/2024/310904a.jpg) A useful little ship from the Potomac Flotilla.
|
Gunner Dunbar ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 22 Sep 2009 10:54 p.m. PST |
Hi guys A mate of mine (trailape) has asked if I would paint up a couple of 40mm ACW dio sets, so I thought I would do a build review for anyone interested in these products in the future, the 2 sets arrived in the post yesterday. I have an interest in the ACW but haven't ventured into this era before. First look- I am doing 2 dio sets, I received 26 figures, including 9 casualties, 2 officers, 2 ensigns, 1 gun, a bag with some loose muscats and odds and sod's, 3 trees, and 2 resin bases. the figures are of a very good wargaming quality, but with more mould lines (mostly very faint)than I would like, they have some nice poses and really give the feel of the era, the gun has a lot of small pieces, but looks good. the trees are soft metal and have bare limbs, the bases are nice but have a lot of small air bubbles, her are a couple of photos of what the kits should look like when finished. picture picture And some photos of the figures, not good photos but the light was going down picture picture picture picture picture picture gunnerswargamming.blogspot.com |
TKindred ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 23 Sep 2009 3:56 a.m. PST |
I am very torn with these. I really like Sash & Sabre's sculpting, and their prices are VERY good. I don't know if the mold seam issue is with these diorama sets or not, as the regular minis I have from them don't exhibit this problem. My main issue is whether to use their 25mm castings or the 40mm ones for my gaming. Mostly, it's an expense issue. My games won't be more than a division per side, and usually brigade-level. I realy LOVE the variety of poses with their 25mm sets, but I am drawn to the 40mm because of the extra detail potential for not just the minis, but buildings, etc. What to do
what to do
. FWIW, I like those diorama sets. I might have to get them at some point. |
trailape | 23 Sep 2009 3:58 a.m. PST |
Hi Dan Looking forward to se what you can do with these two kits. Both were obtained from Old Glory in the US. Cheers |
WarWizard | 23 Sep 2009 6:45 a.m. PST |
I am doing the Alamo in 40MM and really love the figures they have for that range. I find I am really liking this scale. This is the only period I am doing in 40MM right now though. |
Gunner Dunbar ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 23 Sep 2009 10:46 a.m. PST |
just to explain,the mould lines wouldn't be a problem for war gaming, but these are display models so they take a lot of cleaning up and some a so small they are easily missed. |
Rob UK | 23 Sep 2009 4:33 p.m. PST |
|
vojvoda | 24 Sep 2009 2:37 a.m. PST |
I have both kits and use them for wargame figures along side my other S&S 40mm figs. Love the wounded Artillery man, wish I could get about 20 of those for casualty markers. But they do not sell these indivdually. VR James Mattes |
Gunner Dunbar ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 08 Oct 2009 7:50 p.m. PST |
|
TKindred ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 09 Oct 2009 6:42 a.m. PST |
At the risk of upsetting the author, the barrel bands on the Enfield rifle-musket were blued steel, with only the butt plate, trigger guard, and nose cap of brass. The barrel should also be blued, and the lockplate a darkened steel (they were case hardened, and at this scale, would be better off blued like the barrel. That's the way they were issued. SOME appeared with the bluing stripped away, which would mean bright steel barrels and bands. However, it is not known how many, if any, of this pattern were issued (bright steel, etc), as they all appear to have been refurbished by various arsenals, rather than appearing to have been done in the field like that. As the 20th Maine (the subject of this diorama) was issued primarily with Enfields, then that would be the appropriate way to paint them. Also, the Enfield bayonet for this rifle-musket also had the socket and shank blued, with only the triangular blade being in the bright. Respects, |
trailape | 09 Oct 2009 2:35 p.m. PST |
TKindred Thanks for the comments, (Dan is building the Dios for me). Given the 20th Main was a "Veteran" unit by the time of Gettysburg I'm happy with the way they are at present, and dan is working to a deadline, (they are presentation peices), I'm satisfied. trailape.blogspot.com |
TKindred ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 09 Oct 2009 3:09 p.m. PST |
Oh, by all means they are wonderfully painted, and if both you and the customer are satisfied, then that always over-rides anything else. I apologize if I seem like I'm being overly harsh, or anything such as that. It's not what i intended, and if my remarks came off in such a manner, then my apologies to you. I've spent the better part of 40 years studying ACW ephemera, weapons, clothing, etc, and sometimes it just gets the better of me.. ![grin grin](boards/icons/grin.gif) You've got a great deal of telent, and it works very well with those miniatures. Respects, |
Gunner Dunbar ![Supporting Member of TMP Supporting Member of TMP](boards/icons/sp.gif) | 09 Oct 2009 7:26 p.m. PST |
Thanks TKindred I appreciate any helpful comments, I'm afraid though I am interested in the ACW I'm not as familiar with it as the Napoleonic or WWII which are my favoured eras, I will do the rest as you suggested, but will leave these 4 riflemen as is. all comments are welcome. |
trailape | 10 Oct 2009 1:15 a.m. PST |
Hi TKindred Like Dan said, all comments welcomed, (especially informed ones) ;o) Cheers |
Rob UK | 12 Oct 2009 10:57 p.m. PST |
|
firstvarty1979 | 15 Oct 2009 12:33 p.m. PST |
I notice you've gone with a medium blue for the coats. Was this a concious decision? I know some folks like that color, but I prefer a more "realistic" color, more of a navy blue with a lighter blue used as highlights only. If you look at most origiginal and recreated Union uniforms they are mostly that dark color. |
|