Help support TMP


"Trying to find a particular rules set" Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Rules Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Rural Fields and Fences

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets his hands on some fields and fences.


Featured Book Review


530 hits since 6 Sep 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

McLaddie06 Sep 2009 10:07 p.m. PST

I have read about this WWII rules set, but can't remember the name of it. I was wondering if anyone would recognize it.

A central piece of the design is line of sight and recognition. A unit can respond/fire on an enemy that it hasn't seen, and that is rolled for each turn.

Thanks in advance,

Bill H.

Personal logo Dye4minis Supporting Member of TMP06 Sep 2009 10:11 p.m. PST

"Mein Panzer" from Old Dominion Game Works (ODGW)?

Tom Dye
GFI

WKeyser06 Sep 2009 10:36 p.m. PST

Brian Stokes Tank Charts. Great spotting rules. But gets a little bogged down when you have too many vehicles as each rolls for its own spot.
William

Martin Rapier07 Sep 2009 6:31 a.m. PST

Could be the older versions of Command Decision? Possibly TAC:WW2 with the optional rules for randomising target location vs detection based on unit quality??

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP07 Sep 2009 7:17 p.m. PST

Might also be Battlefront from the Fire & Fury guys I think.

Mobius07 Sep 2009 9:40 p.m. PST

A unit can respond/fire on an enemy that it hasn't seen, and that is rolled for each turn.

Doesn't make any sense. All enemy not within sight can be responded too? No matter what the distance?

McLaddie07 Sep 2009 9:47 p.m. PST

Thanks for the suggestions. Mobius, for this rules set, being in line of sight wasn't enough, once a friendly unit *could* see the enemy, they still had to determine if they *did* see it. It seemed to be a core part of the game sequencing.

I read about it last year in an article, which I promptly forgot until recently. So, thank you for the suggestions. I know it wasn't Command Decision, but I will check out the others. I was amazed by the number of WWII rules sets out there.

Martin Rapier08 Sep 2009 5:03 a.m. PST

TAC has the concept of detection and lcoation. Enemy units which are detected can be engaged with suppressive and indirect fire, but have to actually be located be engaged with aimed direct fire.

Personal logo Extra Crispy Sponsoring Member of TMP08 Sep 2009 10:57 a.m. PST

Yeah, Battlefront has a sighting rule that works that way…

Mobius10 Sep 2009 12:05 a.m. PST

Mobius, for this rules set, being in line of sight wasn't enough, once a friendly unit *could* see the enemy, they still had to determine if they *did* see it. It seemed to be a core part of the game sequencing.

Oh. Well, a lot of rules have that, including the granddaddy of all WRG WWII and modern. Units have some kind of disposition. What they are doing or how they situated. In woods, firing, moving, hull down. My rules, Panzer War has that. It is more important what the unit is doing rather than if there is a LOS to it. A LOS is necessary but not sufficient to be sighted.

flicking wargamer17 Sep 2009 7:57 a.m. PST

That could be anything. Battleground WW2 has the same thing.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.