Help support TMP


"FOW Tiger points???" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Rules Message Board


Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article


564 hits since 28 Aug 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

shadow king28 Aug 2009 11:01 a.m. PST

hiya asking the experts here I'm off to buy my FOW stuff and have the books etc (no models yet), 1944, I'm going to get the German Tigers Marsch set that has 5 Tigers in it, I got the new desert book today and found that 4 tigers cost 1540 but in the Europe book only 860?

what the points and I'm not reading some thing here??

Tony

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP28 Aug 2009 11:09 a.m. PST

Mid-war versus late war – late they're cheaper as there's much more high-powered anti-tank kit.

aecurtis Fezian28 Aug 2009 11:11 a.m. PST

They're more effective in Mid War (tm) in the desert, so cost more. Tanks are less expensive in Late War (tm) because more stuff can kill them.

Allen

shadow king28 Aug 2009 11:20 a.m. PST

thanks guys i know i could count on you how much in points is the set exactly?

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP28 Aug 2009 11:26 a.m. PST

It depends what list you use it for….

TodCreasey28 Aug 2009 11:32 a.m. PST

I think LW it is a pretty consistent 215 point per tank so you are looking 5 tanks at 1075 points.

Personal logo Doms Decals Sponsoring Member of TMP28 Aug 2009 11:37 a.m. PST

SS are more – 240 I think, and mid-war higher still, obviously.

Endless Grubs28 Aug 2009 12:47 p.m. PST

FWIW, the five Tiger Marsch kit Tigers have zimmermit--the Tunisian Tiger E's do not.

Matsuru Sami Kaze29 Aug 2009 5:48 a.m. PST

Yes, hardened muck troweled onto an armored slab can cost more than one of those $2,500 USD hammers. The mere over engineering of the Tiger should cost you more. Crack the transmission case and stand by to be awed by the jeweled German watchworks they've crafted. Extra cost could be the extra mechanics and engineers required to keep the Tigers humming like bumblebees. Or knowing that it takes a Tiger to tow a Tiger, could it be that there are a couple built in redundant Tigers in the OB to haul the broken ones to the shops? A Tiger cannot cost enough. Huge resources went into producing a few. Were German too smart for their own pants? Poor babies.

JamesonFirefox29 Aug 2009 10:29 a.m. PST

a friend ran a FoW game once with tigers and then again with the tigers replaced by equal points worth of PzIVs. With the two Tigers the Soviets couldn't do a damn thing but second time with the PzIVs the soviets had a complete walk over and the Germans didn't stand a chance.

Martin Rapier29 Aug 2009 12:48 p.m. PST

"Huge resources went into producing a few"

Well, not really. The RM cost of a Tiger I was only twice that of a Panzer IV, then again a Panther only cost 10% more than a Pz IV, which perhaps shows how ludicrously over-engineered the Panzer IV was!

The big cats did take a bit more maintenance of course.

Moonbeast29 Aug 2009 1:12 p.m. PST

"Or knowing that it takes a Tiger to tow a Tiger"

Or multiple SdKfz 9's.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.