Help support TMP


"Byzantine dilemma!" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Medieval Discussion Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients
Medieval

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Basic Impetus


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Fighting 15's Teutonic Order Command 1410

Command figures for the 1410 Teutonics.


Featured Workbench Article

Adam Paints Some Lady Pirates

Adam loves Scorched Brown...


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


750 hits since 6 Aug 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Fred Cartwright06 Aug 2009 9:17 a.m. PST

I have some Chiltern Miniatures 28mm Early Byzantine Buccelari archers. As supplied they come on fully armoured horses which is not correct for early Byzantines. However on the fully armoured horses they would do quite well for medieval Persians which means they could serve a dual purpose. So should I try and source new horses or accept the armoured ones? If new horses any suggestions for replacements? The figures are quite chunky.

Perris0707 Supporting Member of TMP06 Aug 2009 10:02 a.m. PST

Well, if money is no object, then I would get new un-armoured horses. Essex sell un-armoured horses but they are definitely NOT "chunky". Having said that, I have mounted "chunky" troops on old Hinchliffe horses and I rather like the look. Horses in the ancient world were often much smaller than today's breeds. Off the top of my head I can't think of any other companies that sell horses separately except Hinchliffe and Irregular.

aecurtis Fezian06 Aug 2009 2:41 p.m. PST

This guy?

picture

That's odd. Mine have unarmored horses. But then, I bought mine when they were originally produced by Whitecross, and IIRC, horses were ordered separately. At least, that's what I wound up with.

I would contact Chiltern and ask to exchange them. The unarmored horses in the range, such as:

picture

..will fit interchangeably, although they may appear a bit small to some eyes.

Allen

Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut06 Aug 2009 2:41 p.m. PST

Dixon also does seperate horses, but I'm not sure if they do any for the time period or army in question.

Caliban07 Aug 2009 4:19 a.m. PST

I seem to remember that Chiltern will sell their horses separately – might be worth an email to them to find out?

Paul

Scutatus07 Aug 2009 12:03 p.m. PST

You want the "small" horses by the way. Horses back then were generally smaller than we know today, little more than pony sized. Chiltern gets this right. The big horses one sees in Ancient/early medieval ranges are actually, for the most part, wrong.

Essex and Navigator both sell horses incidentally, but the Chiltern horses are fine and they do indeed sell them seperately.

Fred Cartwright08 Aug 2009 6:02 a.m. PST

This guy?

Yes Allen that's the one. Interesting yours came with unarmoured horses. The non Buccelari cavalry come on unarmoured horses are you sure those aren't the ones you have?

As you can see he would makes a nice medieval Persian – as he is riding an armoured horse wearing mail and firing a bow! Not many 28mm figures of medieval Persians or any for that matter and an army I've always wanted to do. So you can see my dilemma – use the figure as is and start a medieval Persian army too or buy new horses?

By the way Allen are there actually any figures, in any scale that you haven't got or had at some time? lol!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.