Help support TMP


"Wargamming. Does it have a future?" Topic


79 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Profile Article

Wild Creatures: Sea Life

Can sea creatures fit into your wargaming plans?


Current Poll


3,119 hits since 4 Aug 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.

Pages: 1 2 

Connard Sage04 Aug 2009 3:52 p.m. PST

Or will it die out as people learn to spell it properly?

How hard can it be? The bloody word is on or in just about every website, magazine and book that is relevant to the hobby. It can't be accidental, I see it repeated over and over in posts by the same people, usually.

I have other hobbies, their proponents seem to be able to spell them correctly. I don't think I've ever seen 'kenndo', 'gollf', guittar' or mottorcyccle'. Why is wargamming, sorry, wargaming, so 'special?

nycjadie04 Aug 2009 3:57 p.m. PST

I always assumed wargamming was in the British tradition of adding letters. The term "whinge" always throws me for a loop. For some reason I want to pronounce the middle English "g".

nycjadie04 Aug 2009 4:01 p.m. PST

BTW – When I read "wargamming", I am reminded of the 1930's slang word "gams" for ladies legs. "Wargamming" would then be this:

picture

Connard Sage04 Aug 2009 4:02 p.m. PST

I'm British, and I can spell it properly.

I may have mentioned this before, but when I was a youth 'gam(m)' was a slang word for oral sex. Kinda adds a whole new perspective doesn't it?

The Monstrous Jake04 Aug 2009 4:09 p.m. PST

I tried wargamming once, but I kept loosing.

altfritz04 Aug 2009 4:12 p.m. PST

As long as there are Calvary charges and Rouge Traders, I suspect.

Vicshere04 Aug 2009 4:19 p.m. PST

I wargam alot. Thats why kid six is due in about a week :D

lutonjames04 Aug 2009 4:21 p.m. PST

Because it's popular with dyslexics.

abelp0104 Aug 2009 4:26 p.m. PST

I love it when people use "there" when they mean "their" or "to" when they mean "too"!!LOL!! Sorry, didn't mean to be OT.

The Monstrous Jake04 Aug 2009 4:27 p.m. PST

Mostly I think it's people who keep loosing they're moral roles.

chronoglide04 Aug 2009 4:37 p.m. PST

it'll go the way of spelling…..

FABET0104 Aug 2009 4:54 p.m. PST

It's been going for , oh 4000+ years now. I'd say it has legs.

aecurtis Fezian04 Aug 2009 5:41 p.m. PST

>>> Why is wargamming, sorry, wargaming, so 'special'?

It's not. The "wargammers" are. Very "special".

Allen

(I am Spam)04 Aug 2009 5:52 p.m. PST

What about golfing? I know lots of people who play tennis, football or basketball who would never dream of saying "I'm going tennising this week end!" (or footballing or basketballing). Perhaps it's a hobby cultural thing. Hmmm… footballing didn't come up with the red underline so it seems ok too. Maybe they DO go footballing.

Whatisitgood4atwork04 Aug 2009 6:42 p.m. PST

Yes. it has a big futturre.

The Jim Jones Cocktail Hour04 Aug 2009 7:04 p.m. PST

I think to get a pacific answer youl need to arks the right questions.

vojvoda04 Aug 2009 7:13 p.m. PST

Heck I always thought it was two words to begin with?

VR
James Mattes

Rudysnelson04 Aug 2009 7:31 p.m. PST

yes it will have a future. Really tired of hearing this same question year after year. I have heard it since the 1980s.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP04 Aug 2009 7:35 p.m. PST

Every single Speell Chek program that I have used REFUSES to except "wargame" as a single word, in any permutation possible. This is true no matter how many times I "accept" that word or spelliong.
As an experiment, it was perfectly happy to accept "wargamming".

I think it's a conspiracy.

StarfuryXL504 Aug 2009 7:45 p.m. PST

"Wargamming" would then be this:

Didn't see any gams in that picture.

aecurtis Fezian04 Aug 2009 7:52 p.m. PST

I used my *i-ma-gi-NA-tion*.

nazrat04 Aug 2009 8:19 p.m. PST

"I tried wargamming once, but I kept loosing."

That one is becoming more and more accepted as the word "lose". It probably won't be long before the dictionary is changed to accommodate the idiots…

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP04 Aug 2009 8:22 p.m. PST

There is no "the dictionary".
There are a lot of dictionaries, some of which deserve to be nuked more than others.
When a "dictionary" accepts "loose" for "lose", than it is time to start refining the plutonium, and reserve space on the Shuttle.

raducci04 Aug 2009 11:18 p.m. PST

What sort of a moron cant spell wargraming?

Personal logo Wolfshanza Supporting Member of TMP05 Aug 2009 12:05 a.m. PST

cry colic and lose the dogs o' wargammin' ! evil grin

Connard Sage05 Aug 2009 1:15 a.m. PST

yes it will have a future. Really tired of hearing this same question year after year. I have heard it since the 1980s.

Hang on in there. My next thread will be 'Thread titles: does anybody bother reading past them before they jump for the keyboard and make themselves look silly?'

I think you'll like it

What about golfing? I know lots of people who play tennis, football or basketball who would never dream of saying "I'm going tennising this week end!" (or footballing or basketballing). Perhaps it's a hobby cultural thing. Hmmm… footballing didn't come up with the red underline so it seems ok too. Maybe they DO go footballing.

Because it's a compound word, and 'gaming' is perfectly valid on its own.

That wasn't the question however.

It's been going for , oh 4000+ years now. I'd say it has legs.

I can't make my mind up about this one. It's either devilishly clever. Or…

Griefbringer05 Aug 2009 1:33 a.m. PST

Luckily the future will be saved be by the wargrammar and warspelling (though the later will be more popular amongst fantasy gamers).

raylev305 Aug 2009 2:21 a.m. PST

After checking:

MS Word spell check doesn't have either version and it recommends "war gaming."

Webster's recognizes wargaming, but not wargamming, but it uses the root "war-game" to define it.

Dictionary.com either treats it as two separate words or puts a hyphen between the two, and uses "gaming" but not "gamming."

The British-based Cambridge Dictionaries Online has "war game" as two separate words.

Dictionary.co.uk doesn't recognize anything but "war game" and only its use as a noun.

Personally, I like "wargaming," since gaming is a word and we wargamers (or are we wargammers?) illegally have created a compound word where one is not recognized.

But, hey, I'm an American and I put my quotation marks on the outside of the punctuation mark and I don't use the French occupation force's spelling of center (centre).

vojvoda05 Aug 2009 5:39 a.m. PST

If you play with paper soldiers is it woragami?

VR
James Mattes

nazrat05 Aug 2009 6:18 a.m. PST

"There is no "the dictionary". "

Yeah, my mistake. The point remains, though, and your solution if it does happen sounds pretty darn good.

The Jim Jones Cocktail Hour05 Aug 2009 6:30 a.m. PST

"If you play with paper soldiers is it woragami?"

More to the point,if some guys from your club come over for a spot of gamming is it Bukakke?

Jemima Fawr05 Aug 2009 6:38 a.m. PST

I was only just having a discussion on another forum regarding pendants flown from tank turrents…

Prince Rupert of the Rhine05 Aug 2009 6:40 a.m. PST

Because it's popular with dyslexics.

Ahh the annual TMP take the Bleeped text out of people with learning difficulities thread. As a someone with dyslexia I do try very hard to keep my spelling and grammer upto the level required by the TMP elite. Sadly as someone pointed out spell checkers don't always work the way they're suppose to and neither does my brain. Still if it makes people feel smug and superior what the hell.

Fat Wally05 Aug 2009 6:49 a.m. PST

war…gamming, I wanna gamm it wid you.

Connard Sage05 Aug 2009 7:09 a.m. PST

After checking:

MS Word spell check doesn't have either version and it recommends "war gaming."

Webster's recognizes wargaming, but not wargamming, but it uses the root "war-game" to define it.

*sigh*

Ever regret starting something?

My original observation, that the some of you seem to have missed by a country mile, is that 'wargamming' or even bloody war-gamming is wrong. Incorrect. Not right., but (presumably) educated people are still wont to use it. Even in the face of evidence to the contrary.

And even in otherwise correctly spelled missives, which rather obviates the 'dyslexic' route. Which I never mentioned anyway.

It was, in the last analysis, a Bleeped text-take. Not an invitation to an intellectual discourse on the etymology of the name of our mutual hobby.

Personal logo enfant perdus Supporting Member of TMP05 Aug 2009 7:11 a.m. PST

More to the point,if some guys from your club come over for a spot of gamming is it Bukakke?

Ugh. Thanks for that image. Now you've ruined wargaming for me, not to mention wargamming and possibly breakfast as well.

raylev305 Aug 2009 8:35 a.m. PST

Well, then Connard, ol' buddy, I'd say you didn't communicate your intent very well. But, hey, you made us think!

But then again, we've all seen many a thread start off with one subject or question and wind up in hell.

Connard Sage05 Aug 2009 8:40 a.m. PST

Well, then Connard, ol' buddy, I'd say you didn't communicate your intent very well. But, hey, you made us think!


Yes, I can see how this may have confused some of the more challenged

Wargamming. Does it have a future? Or will it die out as people learn to spell it properly?

How hard can it be? The bloody word is on or in just about every website, magazine and book that is relevant to the hobby. It can't be accidental, I see it repeated over and over in posts by the same people, usually.


Lesson learned. I'll try to use monosyllables in future :)

streetline05 Aug 2009 8:58 a.m. PST

And…. relax.

nazrat05 Aug 2009 9:26 a.m. PST

Connard, regardless of how wrong it went (or might still go as more pile on and either misread the title and/or not read the thread at all) it was a great topic. I thought it was funny. And sad. 8)=

The Monstrous Jake05 Aug 2009 11:01 a.m. PST

Can't we just get back to talking about weapontry?

raylev305 Aug 2009 11:11 a.m. PST

Chill, baby, chill. If you say one thing and everyone else does another either you had a failure to communicate or we all ignored you -- happens all the time.

Bandolier05 Aug 2009 11:12 a.m. PST

I agree with nazrat. A very interesting topic on several levels. Just today I saw an ebay auction for 'woodern fences for wargamming'. It made me cringe. I think ebay is a good source of fuel for this topic. I used to search 'foundary' because I could always pick up some hits to explore.

Derek H05 Aug 2009 1:34 p.m. PST

I was only just having a discussion on another forum regarding pendants flown from tank turrents…

That should be pedants surely.

Angel Barracks05 Aug 2009 2:47 p.m. PST

I tried wargamming once, but I kept loosing.


Nice one.

:D

The Jim Jones Cocktail Hour05 Aug 2009 6:18 p.m. PST

Pedants are usually hoist by their own petard rather than flown from tank turrets. However, given a small enough pedant and a Churchill AVRE it should be entirely possible to combine the two.

raducci05 Aug 2009 9:05 p.m. PST

Dyslexic wargaming is nuf.

Whatisitgood4atwork05 Aug 2009 10:53 p.m. PST

No. I think it is time we all switched to 100% Warspelling. The only spelling that's 100%. And war.

Beware of other warspelling that isn't 100%. It may only be 97%, and then where would you be?

Send no money! Oh heck, who am I kidding? Send money. Send lots of money. Send it all. Send it now and keeps sending 100% of your money to me and get your 100% warspelling. The only spelling that's 100% spelled warspelling.

GarrisonMiniatures06 Aug 2009 1:57 a.m. PST

Must be August.

raducci06 Aug 2009 4:06 a.m. PST

"Must be August."
Not in the Southern Hemisphere. Its January here as were 6 months behind (Greenwitch Mean Time).

Pages: 1 2