Help support TMP


"frocks, sacks & jackets" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Painting Guides Message Board

Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset

Stars & Bars


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:600 USRC Reliance

A useful little ship from the Potomac Flotilla.


1,173 hits since 5 Jul 2009
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Jeffersonian05 Jul 2009 5:11 p.m. PST

It is often assumed that U.S. infantry in frock coat and regulation hat were likely to be "early war" and those in the sensible sack coat and forage cap to be mid-to-late war. The reality was actually more complex.

Take for example the 104th Illinois Volunteers. The Company of Military Historians plate series (Military Uniforms in America, Plate No. 388) depicts the uniforms of the 104th Illinois, which served in the Army of the Cumberland and saw action at Chickamauga, Missionary Ridge, Buzzard Roost, Resaca, New Hope Church, Kenesaw Mountain, Peach Tree Creek, Utoy Creek and Bentonville, suffering 405 casualties during the war.

Their first uniform, received at Louisville, KY in Sept. 1862, was the Illinois state-issued uniform — dark blue forage cap, sky blue trousers and dark blue jacket with shoulder straps. The Jacket was trimmed with sky blue piping around the collar, cuffs and shoulder straps.

In Dec of 1862 the regiment was surprised and captured by John Hunt Morgan's command at Hartsville, TN, suffering 30 percent casualties. After being paroled, the unit was reorganized and returned to duty in April 1863, this time wearing sack coats and forage caps. The caps were soon replaced by hats, however. Their new brigade commander, John Beatty ordered his regimental officers to requisition regulation hats for all enlisted men to maintain uniformity throughout the brigade: "All white hats, citizens clothing, and un-uniform clothing will be collected and burned." A tailor in the 104th "lowered the regulation felt hat, to a one story affair" for some of the men.

By the Atlanta Campaign of 1864 the sack coats had been reduced to tatters and had been largely replaced by regulation frock coats. Photographs indicate that many of them had the standing collar lowered, presumably by tailors in the ranks.

Jackets to sack coats to frocks; not the usual transition, but perhaps not at all untypical.

Another note about jackets: Photographs of Missouri volunteer regiments raised in 1864 show them in plain blue jackets without piping. These were worn in the final years of the war rather than the early years. Go figure…

ScottWashburn Sponsoring Member of TMP06 Jul 2009 6:47 a.m. PST

Yes, there were a lot of variations. My own reenactment unit, the 61st NY Infantry, started the war in NY state jackets (sort of a shell jacket style), but later ended up in sack coats because they couldn't get replacemnts for the worn-out state jackets. Just before the start of the 1864 campaign, they were all re-supplied with brand new frock coats and by the end they were mostly back in sack coats again.

Wizard Whateley06 Jul 2009 9:06 a.m. PST

And there were the veteran's jackets which were obtained through private purchase when units would go home for recruiting in 1864. Sometimes had zouave style trim in light blue. I gave up trying to paint a Union unit to a specific uniform (unless they're zouaves, of course) long ago.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.