"Napoleonic 2nd Edition compared with Sash and Saber" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article A simple, low-effort technique for naval bases.
Featured Profile Article
|
Chortle  | 29 Jun 2009 11:26 p.m. PST |
I know that both are good figures. I think 2nd Ed are 28mm compared with 26mm for S&S. Can someone who has both compare them for me? |
 Miniatureships  | 30 Jun 2009 3:59 a.m. PST |
I just put a S&S next to a 2nd edition and side by side they blend prefectly. I would like to point out the two lines are sculpted by the same person, so they should blend well together. |
| WarWizard | 30 Jun 2009 5:47 a.m. PST |
I know the Old Glory 2nd Ed ACW and Sash and Saber ACW 25mm blend seamlessly. |
| ArchiducCharles | 30 Jun 2009 7:37 a.m. PST |
I don't own 2nd Ed, but Sash & Saber are indeed on the 25mm side, which explains why they are almost the only line that blends perfectly with Foundry Naps. |
| wrgmr1 | 30 Jun 2009 8:05 a.m. PST |
I have S & S Austrian Line and OG 1st Ed Landwher. The OG are a tad taller but not noticeably. Same shape, but the S & S are a better sculpt. See image.
picture Line in front, Landwher in back. |
| Chortle | 30 Jun 2009 8:08 p.m. PST |
Sounds good. I'm going to add some S&S to my order for OG 2nd ed. This is just for a bit of variety in units. |
|
