
"Rules of the Game - by Andrew Gordon" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Historical Media Message Board Back to the Interwar (WWI to WWII) Message Board Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board Back to the WWII Naval Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral 19th Century World War One World War Two on the Land World War Two at Sea
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article You can pick up a toy blimp in the local toy department for less than a dollar.
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| 6pounder | 28 Jun 2009 7:01 a.m. PST |
Apropos of nothing but astonishment at the scholarship involved
While explicating the manifold interrelationships between Victoria's navy (more or less an enormous yachting club,) and British Royalty, Andrew Gordon writes this paragraph in "THE RULES OF THE GAME, Jutland and the British Naval Command." It concerns the dispersion of MELAMPUS senior crew (which included Even-Thomas who would play such a pivotal and eternally debatable role commanding 5BS at Jutland,) after Prince George was done with "commanding" her in what was to be his last assignment at sea (because his elder brother died and he was next in line to the throne.) "Godfrey-Faussett himself went out to the Pacific to be flag-lieutenant to Rear-Admiral Henry Stephenson (equerry to the Prince of Wales, 1878-93). He "undoubtedly owed the appointment to the good offices of Prince George," whose additional equerry he became in 1901 and remained for thirty-five years. Suitably for a courtier, he married Eugenie Dudley Ward whose uncle, the 2nd Viscount Esher, was a member of Queen Victoria's private circle. Bryan later took pains to smooth the acceptance at Court of Captain David Beatty and his divorcee wife -- to be repaid with Beatty's affair with Eugenie. The Godfrey-Faussetts' son David, as a matter of interest, was the Swordfish pilot credited with spiking BISMARCK'S rudder in 1941." (p. 236) So there you have it: the future of the German navy from Jutland to the sinking of the Bismarck defined by the need to keep a crown prince in good company. An "equerry," btw is defined here link as a sort modern day squire or page. |
| Connard Sage | 28 Jun 2009 7:10 a.m. PST |
explicating Which dictionary is that word in?  |
| 6pounder | 28 Jun 2009 8:45 a.m. PST |
You made me think it was only in my personal one (i.e. I made the word up.) But I was using it in the second sense: link |
| Cpt Arexu | 28 Jun 2009 11:01 a.m. PST |
It's English, o Sage Connard: link Explicatingex·pli·cate Pronunciation: \ˈek-splə-ˌkāt\ Function: transitive verb Inflected Form(s): ex·pli·cat·ed; ex·pli·cat·ing Etymology: Latin explicatus, past participle of explicare, literally, to unfold, from ex- + plicare to fold — more at ply Date: 1531 1 : to give a detailed explanation of 2 : to develop the implications of : analyze logically
|
| aercdr | 28 Jun 2009 11:31 a.m. PST |
Rules of the Game is a great book. Profound insights, tremendous detail and great battle descriptions. I've even given away copies to friends. (Shattered Sword is the only other naval book so honored.) |
| Connard Sage | 28 Jun 2009 3:02 p.m. PST |
It's English, o Sage Connard: Well it ain't in the OED
so I reckon it's American
|
| 6pounder | 28 Jun 2009 4:51 p.m. PST |
SAGE Connard
well, I may not stand corrected exactly but I do agree that it borders on bombast when one could as easily use "explain." There is however an ever so slightly different connotation. But it's a bit like writing "utilize" instead of "use," and so I will endeavor to pull my socks up and do better next time. aercdr: Funny you should mention SHATTERED SWORD in the context of gift giving. Me too, and I intend to give THE RULES OF THE GAME to the same people
although it seems hard to come up with cheap copies here in the US. It is an astonishing book even for those familiar with the topic. |
| John D Salt | 30 Jun 2009 2:37 p.m. PST |
Connard Sage a dit:
Well it ain't in the OED
so I reckon it's American
It's in my copy of the Shorter Oxford. It therefore seems inevitable that it is also in the OED itself. Of course, it may not be in the Concise, but that is not the OED. All the best, John. |
| Gwydion | 08 Jul 2009 12:30 p.m. PST |
John, Certainly IS in the Concise -at least it is in my Fifth edition 2nd 1975 printing. Guy |
|