"how many of us use regulating battalions in their rules?" Topic
301 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the 19th Century Discussion Message Board Back to the 18th Century Discussion Message Board Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of Interest18th Century Napoleonic American Civil War 19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleTod gives us another look at his "old school" Boxer Rebellion figures.
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
rdjktjrfdj | 07 Apr 2009 2:15 a.m. PST |
I will again be of very little use as I am unable to cite, but nevertheless this is what I remember from many years ago from a booklet on Crimean War battles. At Alma, the left of the advancing English line (several battalions) stopped and formed squares because of a perceived danger from Russian cavalry. The rest of the line proceeded onward. We could attempt to create a list of possible actions by different levels of command, perhaps a battalion commander can form square or dispatch skirmishers, brigade commander has some influence on formation or could maybe give a secondary task to some unit. Squadron commander may retreat his unit to redress ranks. I am just guessing here, I never did research the issue. It could depend on doctrine or personal characteristics of the commander and his superior. And when a situation questioned the previous order, just factor everything up, similarly to how it is done in Ironbow. It need not be a comprehensive or complicated list. And would slow maneuvers, emphasize need for reserves, give purpose to individual squadrons distributed throughout infantry. Nice. |
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
|