Help support TMP


"Flames of War and Historical Scenarios" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the WWII Rules Message Board


Action Log

15 Oct 2008 8:19 a.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

World War Two on the Land

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

FUBAR


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


2,617 hits since 17 Sep 2008
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian17 Sep 2008 1:06 p.m. PST

As a Flames of War player, what is your level of interest in FoW scenarios based on real events?

Grumpy Monkey17 Sep 2008 1:12 p.m. PST

That's almost all we play, Fire and Fury have a good selection of scenarios

toofatlardies17 Sep 2008 1:17 p.m. PST

I must admit that we sell lots of our company level scenarios for IABSM to FoW players. They are designed for exactly the same level games and FoW players tell me they convert across with almost no work at all.

Beowulf Fezian17 Sep 2008 1:22 p.m. PST

Very high.

David Cliffel17 Sep 2008 1:24 p.m. PST

Very very high

panzerCDR17 Sep 2008 1:37 p.m. PST

Pretty high. I like the generic battle types included in the rule books, but lately I have been adapting other historical scenarios to play. It seems I lose anyway ;), but I like the feel of a historic game, where the objectives mean something, other than their mere placement on the table by the opponents.

Grizwald17 Sep 2008 1:44 p.m. PST

"Flames of War" "Historical Scenarios"

??? A contradiction of terms, surely?

Martin Rapier17 Sep 2008 1:58 p.m. PST

I'm not a FOW player but scenarios based on historical events are really all that interest me, in the main.

How do you deal with FOWs logarithmic ground scale though?

Tom Reed17 Sep 2008 2:22 p.m. PST

Pretty high. If anyone knows of some good usable scenarios for Tunisia I would be very interested. Specifically Kasserine Pass and Kerns Crossroads.

SeattleGamer Supporting Member of TMP17 Sep 2008 2:28 p.m. PST

I'm always interested in scenario books, regardless of the target rule system, as long as they are geared for the level of play that I am interested in. I can always convert them to "my" chosen rules.

Anything for FOW would interest me, I like that scale (and that game in fact).

Aurelian18 Sep 2008 8:38 a.m. PST

I think it'd be useful to see more historical scenarios for FOW, certainly. I do think the bizarre scale choices might make some items difficult, but then again, a scenario designer has the choice to leave artillery off table, widen or shorten ranges, etc.

-A.

Personal logo John the OFM Supporting Member of TMP18 Sep 2008 5:41 p.m. PST

FOWs logarithmic ground scale

Is THAT what you call it?

rferrars19 Sep 2008 12:26 p.m. PST

I play with Battlefront WW2 but really enjoy writing scenarios – take a look on the scenarios page on the BF:WW2 site – have spent three years (with Paddy Green) writing scenarios based on 12SS in Normandy (Blood & Honour series). We have about 10 on the site (another 2-3 in the pipeline) – great fun to focus on 1 unit in one theatre. They may well translate to FoW ….

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.