Help support TMP


"Mona Lisa unmasked..." Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Renaissance Media Message Board

Back to the Renaissance Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Renaissance

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Profile Article

The Simtac Tour

The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.


Featured Book Review


786 hits since 15 Jan 2008
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Condottiere15 Jan 2008 10:17 a.m. PST

Interesting article. Mystery solved at last, or until someone else comes along to dispute the margin notes' authenticity! laugh

mweaver15 Jan 2008 10:49 a.m. PST

Yes, thanks for that link.

Grizwald15 Jan 2008 11:12 a.m. PST

Of course, then there's the view that the Mona Lisa is in fact a self portrait …

unmuseum.org/leocode.htm

Oddball15 Jan 2008 12:13 p.m. PST

A self portrait??????

Leonardo da Vinci was a drag queen?

I hadn't heard that before.

Mulopwepaul15 Jan 2008 12:54 p.m. PST

What mystery? La Gioconda was in fact Signora del Giocondo--who would have suspected.

That's like talking about the "mystery" of who wrote Shakespeare--all the evidence points to Shakespeare, and conspiracy theorists argue circularly from lack of evidence for their own preferred candidates.

mweaver15 Jan 2008 1:24 p.m. PST

Mulopwepaul, as the article noted, until now there were no references to the work until a generation later, when Vesari said it was a portrait of Signora del Giocondo. Likewise, there was no evidence (and for that matter, still isn't) that the picture was ever referred to as "La Gioconda" by da Vinci or anyone else when it was first painted. Thus, the reference to the painting as "La Gioconda" could have come from Vasari's assertion that she was the subject for the portrait.

I think most people have long accepted the Signora del Giocondo theory – but it is nice to have stronger contemporary evidence.

Now, about the theory that Signora del Giocondo wrote Shakespeare's plays…

Phillius15 Jan 2008 2:36 p.m. PST

"A self portrait??????

Leonardo da Vinci was a drag queen?

I hadn't heard that before."

About 20 years ago another bunch of techs used some sort of digital/x-ray/unveling thingee to digitally remove the layers of paint on the canvass. When they got it down to the bare canvas, what they found underneath was a pencil drawing of the artist himself.
Along with all the rumours about the artist never spending his spare time in the company of women, and always being around men, it led people to believe that the Mona Lisa was in fact a self portrait, of a type.

We will never know the truth.

mweaver16 Jan 2008 7:47 a.m. PST

Exactly.

It also often happened with parchment.

Monkey of Shallott22 Jan 2008 12:06 p.m. PST

Shakespeare's plays weren't written by Shakespeare, but by another dramatist of the same name.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.