
"Early Nubian vs Neo Assyrians in FoG" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Field of Glory Rules Board
Areas of InterestAncients Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.
Featured Workbench Article Using pink stuff for basework.
Featured Profile Article Four and last of the Wild Creatures series.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| listlurker | 28 Jun 2013 1:31 a.m. PST |
|
| sumerandakkad | 28 Jun 2013 11:23 a.m. PST |
I don't think the Nubians or Numidians are meant to do a straight up fight. They are more ebb and flow armies IMHO. Nice detail and AAR. I would love an Assyrian army! Maybe the next one! |
| mikeygees | 30 Jun 2013 8:24 a.m. PST |
We have to accommodate for the rules being played. I think armies like the Mongols and/or Huns have never been properly represented in DBA, DBM, FOG
.. |
| lou cardinale | 03 Aug 2013 5:38 p.m. PST |
Very nice AAR. In response to the last statement, if you want to see Mongols and Huns properly represented, play DBMM2. |
|