"WRG Corps D'Armee rules" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Corps d'Armee Rules Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
EagleSixFive | 17 Sep 2008 9:39 a.m. PST |
Anyone using these still? |
vdal1812 | 17 Sep 2008 1:50 p.m. PST |
I haven't used them in a long time but I do know of a group that does use them to play. A good set of rules. |
vtsaogames | 18 Sep 2008 11:52 a.m. PST |
I used to play quite a few WRG games (Ancients, 1750-1850, 1925-1950) and never heard of these. |
Connard Sage | 18 Sep 2008 2:25 p.m. PST |
|
Jeremy Sutcliffe | 18 Sep 2008 3:52 p.m. PST |
OK Connard, I'll believe the that's the front page but, like vtsaogames, I've never heard of them. However they are listed in the Wikipedia WRG page link |
EagleSixFive | 19 Sep 2008 4:32 a.m. PST |
Thanks to all. My impressions and Im not done reading yet is they are a good set. With modern produstion qualities and a clean up, they could be be very popular. Missed opportunity me thinks. someone paid 20 quid for a copy on ebay recently! |
Bandit | 19 Sep 2008 9:31 p.m. PST |
I have em and think they are alright, I bought them but didn't play them a whole lot. I found the command and control too typical which is the fault I find in most rules. Otherwise, pretty good. Cheers, The Bandit |
Duc de Limbourg | 21 Sep 2008 11:31 p.m. PST |
way back we used them for some time. I liked them but they were slow |
Jeremy Sutcliffe | 24 Apr 2009 8:45 a.m. PST |
Just picked them up for £7.00 GBP on e-bay. After EagleSixFive's comment above, I thought I'd have much more of a tussle. It's now wait and see. |
|