"Wars of the Roses - Might of Arms" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Might of Arms Rules Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article Get these inexpensive dinos while you can.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
DukeWacoan   | 22 Feb 2012 6:24 p.m. PST |
We played a Wars of the Roses battle at our mini-Con in Waco this weekend using Front Rank figs and Might of Arms rules. The Pretender Richmond was defeated when Edward managed to keep potential traitors from defecting over. Actually no one won, everyone just managed to avoid losing. Rules played really well and fast. Pictures can be seen here on pages 22 thru 26 here:
link |
| Fat Wally | 23 Feb 2012 12:29 a.m. PST |
Lovely looking bunch of figures there. |
| Jeremy Sutcliffe | 23 Feb 2012 2:45 a.m. PST |
"Might of Arms" is a pretty good set of rules. |
| Forager | 23 Feb 2012 4:46 p.m. PST |
Great looking game! I agree with Jeremy's comment as well. MoA is a good, solid, set of rules. |
| DukeWacoan | 23 Feb 2012 6:42 p.m. PST |
We do not rate units as A, B, etc, but rather rate all at a Morale of 7, then give a +1 for every flag in the unit, then a +2 for battle commander present, and +1 if you are in contact with the battle commander unit. This makes play much faster and also give a bump to units staying in a "battle", which is historical. Other than that we are running MoA straight. |
| Brummie Lad | 24 Feb 2012 12:49 p.m. PST |
|
|
