"feelings on Classical Hack?" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Classical Hack Rules Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article The last - the most elusive - set of dino skellies...
Featured Workbench Article Don't let the horses daunt you!
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
| jgawne | 01 Feb 2002 7:15 a.m. PST |
OK- what are the feelings on this rule set. Theliterature looks interesting. |
| Bob the Great | 04 Feb 2002 12:33 a.m. PST |
I bought it and was sorely disappointed. The rules look, feel and play like a cross between DBx and the old WRG series if I remember correctly - we played it for about a dozen games and then went back to DBx/Armati. Its not that there is anything specifically wrong with them, its just not an enjoyable game IMHO. On a brighter note, the scenarios book on Roman armies is quite nice and more or less applicable to DBx. |
| Minifreek | 27 Jul 2002 7:40 p.m. PST |
I have the second edition and the Roman scenario book, its nothing like DBx/Armati, I dont know what bob is playing but it wasnt HACK!
The rules are fine, if anything a breath of fresh air from the typical DBx games out there. Minifreek |
|
takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.