"5 Test Battles for Ancients Rulesets (Round 1A)" Topic
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the 5 Test Battles for Ancients Rulesets (Round 1A) Poll
|TKindred ||19 Apr 2017 5:30 a.m. PST|
Can't be done. needs to be more period specific.
What makes WAB and Impetus such great systems is that they are just that: A set of core mechanics/rules, with era-specific add-ons to model/game specific eras and armies/empires/etc.
|rmaker||19 Apr 2017 10:49 a.m. PST|
Hastings and Agincourt aren't Ancients. And Chalons is borderline.
| piper909 ||19 Apr 2017 11:54 a.m. PST|
Others: Marathon, Leuctra, Zama, Plataea, Pydna.
Oh -- these are alphabetical, ain't they? Oops.
|Who asked this joker||19 Apr 2017 3:11 p.m. PST|
I find Cannae is a terrible battle to even replicate. The Roman's made severe tactical errors which cost them their entire army…4 consular armies! Most gamers are not willing to fall into the same trap.
|Frederick ||20 Apr 2017 4:29 a.m. PST|
I totally agree that Cannae would not be a great test battle – first, very big and second – like Who Asked This Joker is point on!
|Khusrau||20 Apr 2017 8:57 a.m. PST|
rmaker, I think you will find the vast majority of 'ancients' rules cover up to quite late medieval periods before gunpowder technology dominates the battlefield. Perfectly acceptable to refer to Agincourt and Chalons in this context, as no one has specified, Classical, Late Classic, Early/High Medieval or any other distinction. The most dominant ancients rules in use over the last 40 years by WRG covered 3000 – 1500 CE.