"Are You a Late Adopter?" Topic
10 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Are You a Late Adopter? Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench ArticleNeed custom bases?
Featured Profile ArticleDelayed by circumstances, the 2016 Christmas Project finally arrives!
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
robert piepenbrink | 19 Jan 2018 4:51 a.m. PST |
Seemed like a very strange question to me in the pre-poll discussion, and still does. What difference does it make to me what "everyone else" is playing? The rules I play ate the ones I find well suited to my table, time and preferred mechanics. |
Frederick | 19 Jan 2018 7:05 a.m. PST |
This is an interesting question that I think comes from the culture change literature I agree with Robert – given the wide variability in what people game it largely depends on how much you like the current set of rules you are working with |
Winston Smith | 19 Jan 2018 7:13 a.m. PST |
Are we lemmings? Hmmm. Maybe yes. All this whining about rules not being supported, etc. |
dandiggler | 19 Jan 2018 7:42 a.m. PST |
I guess it's relevant if you play in tournaments, but this has never been an issue for me. New or old, I use the rules that work best for me. |
robert piepenbrink | 19 Jan 2018 8:16 a.m. PST |
We have lemmings among us. I was interested in the recent thread on illustrations in rules which brought up the "threat" that if we didn't pay more money for rules, we wouldn't be on the cutting edge of wargame rules fashion. I think it's hard enough to devise rules in which different armies all stand a chance of winning and sound historical tactics are rewarded without worrying about whether the turn sequence or attrition method used are popular this year. |
Micman | 19 Jan 2018 9:16 a.m. PST |
For me it is more what games other people have put on. If I like the rules and subject then I will pick up the rules. I try not to buy rules just to sit on the shelf. |
Shagnasty | 19 Jan 2018 9:38 a.m. PST |
Rules should be chosen for their ability to satisfy the gamer not for simply being new or a la mode. Ice cream seldom improves a rule set. |
robert piepenbrink | 19 Jan 2018 9:48 a.m. PST |
Brooding about "supported." I think it's a tournament thing. For me, if you have to e-mail the author to find out what you or your opponent can or must do in a situation, there's either something wrong with the rules or something wrong with the opponent. If the rules clearly tell me what my options are and what the dice rolls mean, the author has done his bit. If there are, say, 50 scenarios either written for the rules or easily adapted to them, how much more "support" does one need? |
Parzival | 19 Jan 2018 11:29 a.m. PST |
I couldn't care less what "everybody else" is doing. If the game looks fun, and contains ideas and themes I like, I'll give it a go. Otherwise, the only function of popularity is to let me know that the game exists and has a decent reputation. |
rmaker | 19 Jan 2018 1:07 p.m. PST |
|
|