| Martin Rapier | 21 Nov 2008 1:08 a.m. PST |
a) do we mean irony or sarcasm, two very different things and the latter rather rude. Not very sure I'd like to advertise sarcasm. b) 'snark'???? what sort of word is that? Is it a North Americanism? |
| Plynkes | 21 Nov 2008 2:40 a.m. PST |
Doesn't matter. Whichever one I see I won't remember what it's supposed to mean. I am unfamiliar with this word outside of the realms of nonsense poetry. |
| Parmenion | 21 Nov 2008 2:42 a.m. PST |
Come on, everyone knows what a Snark is, they're the big green alien lizards from Power Pack. |
| Connard Sage | 21 Nov 2008 4:03 a.m. PST |
b) 'snark'???? what sort of word is that? Is it a North Americanism? It's a neologism. A combination of 'sarcastic' and 'snide' I think. Probably, but who cares anyway? It only exists in the OED as a nonsense word created by Lewis Carroll ::) |
Doms Decals  | 21 Nov 2008 4:06 a.m. PST |
Yep; rubbish term, as it's only really used in North America
. |
| nvdoyle | 21 Nov 2008 5:12 a.m. PST |
A word really isn't an emoticon. What might be of better use is an 'eyeroll' smiley. |
| Plynkes | 21 Nov 2008 6:40 a.m. PST |
That's a good point. If the emoticon is just a word, then it is a pretty rubbish one, and not really doing its job. Why not just type the bloody word, as you won't need to hit so many keys? |
20thmaine  | 21 Nov 2008 7:36 a.m. PST |
Is snark a word ? Other than The hunting of the Snark of course
. in any case shouldn't it be snarc wouldn't "sarcastic comment" be a better choice ? "SNARK"
|
John the OFM  | 21 Nov 2008 8:01 a.m. PST |
I thought I made it quite clear when this forst came up that we did not need one. If anyone is offended by me, I do not wish to dilute the meaning of it. Make one, I shan't use it. In any event, TMP emoticons are far too small anyway, for me to be able to figure them out. They are basically a waste of time, but leave them in. For the Children. |
miniMo  | 21 Nov 2008 8:01 a.m. PST |
Encouraging more snarkiness, lovely. |
Editor in Chief Bill  | 21 Nov 2008 8:10 a.m. PST |
TMP emoticons are far too small anyway
You prefer large emoticons? |
| Jamesonsafari | 21 Nov 2008 8:33 a.m. PST |
It's a perfectly good word. My family has used "snarky" for years; e.g. "That was a bit snarky, wasn't it?" or "Why are you so snarky today?" Of course my family talks funny. I got a funny look at work once using the term 'wonky'
|
Parzival  | 21 Nov 2008 8:53 a.m. PST |
"Snark": A statement which is sarcastic, snide, cutting, typically contemptuous, often disguised as polite. For example, "Why yes, those white criss-cross belts add so much to your uniform. And it's very sporting of you to give the enemy such an excellent targeting line, too!" *snark* The female persuasion tend to be masters of the art form. The simple statement, "Nice dress," can contain an ocean of contempt. |
| Palafox | 21 Nov 2008 9:17 a.m. PST |
We need Mr. Green emoticon. The best international indicator for snarkiness, irony and sarcasm on the web. |
| Connard Sage | 21 Nov 2008 9:19 a.m. PST |
We need Mr. Green emoticon. The best international indicator for snarkiness, irony and sarcasm on the web. neverheardofit <rolleyes> |
| Palafox | 21 Nov 2008 9:29 a.m. PST |
"neverheardofit <rolleyes>" But you don't need it, mate. You need an icon when you're not being snarky. <mrgreen> |
John the OFM  | 21 Nov 2008 9:38 a.m. PST |
TMP emoticons are far too small anyway
You prefer large emoticons?
Well, I can't read or deduce half of them now
That's the main reason I only use in my "work". |
| nazrat | 21 Nov 2008 10:32 a.m. PST |
I suppose one can claim it isn't a word all one wants, but language constantly evolves (or devolves in some folks' opinion) and snark is used fairly regularly by a large number of people. Definition in the Urban Dictionary here-- link |
| nazrat | 21 Nov 2008 10:33 a.m. PST |
Do we NEED an emoticon for it? Do we really need ANY emoticons? I'd say no, but we're kind of stuck with them now, so why not use them? Kind of like computers in general
8)= |
| UltraOrk | 21 Nov 2008 11:14 a.m. PST |
We definitely need one!!! Can't understand what anyone is talking about without it! *snark* |
| sneakgun | 21 Nov 2008 11:36 a.m. PST |
Perhaps we should hunt them, link ? |
| Lentulus | 21 Nov 2008 11:39 a.m. PST |
How about a substitution so when someone uses the snark emoticon they see the text "You are clearly too dim to understand my obvious point" and everyone else sees it as "I am clearly too poor a writer to communicate my obvious point" |
| quidveritas | 21 Nov 2008 1:01 p.m. PST |
I'm too dim to understand what a "snark" is. :o)) mjc |
| timlillig | 22 Nov 2008 6:40 a.m. PST |
Interesting to see the UK guys saying this is an American term. I have not encountered it in common usage here and assumed it was British. |
| fred12df | 22 Nov 2008 1:10 p.m. PST |
snark -- is a very strange choice of word. I think an eyes-rolling icon would be useful -- but frankly if you need to make it obvious when you are taking the then its a bit redundant. |
| Ditto Tango 2 1 | 22 Nov 2008 4:58 p.m. PST |
I think an eyes-rolling icon would be useful Me too. I have no idea what a snark is. -- Tim |