"How Long to Wait Before Revising the Rules?" Topic
11 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the How Long to Wait Before Revising the Rules? Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleIs there finally a gluestick worth buying for paper modelers?
Current Poll
|
DisasterWargamer | 28 May 2017 6:01 a.m. PST |
|
rmaker | 28 May 2017 9:25 a.m. PST |
|
Winston Smith | 28 May 2017 9:28 a.m. PST |
Never. Let him get it right the first time. |
advocate | 28 May 2017 9:34 a.m. PST |
|
Frederick | 28 May 2017 11:30 a.m. PST |
I agree with "it depends" – sometimes you need it next year, sometimes never |
USAFpilot | 28 May 2017 1:18 p.m. PST |
Revise when needed. If something is broken, you fix it. |
pvernon | 28 May 2017 2:36 p.m. PST |
Revise when/if needed, other than that it's a marketing ploy. |
Who asked this joker | 28 May 2017 3:28 p.m. PST |
+1 Winston Smith. If properly play-tested, rules should not ever require revising. Errata? Sure. We all make mistakes. |
TunnelRat | 29 May 2017 3:01 a.m. PST |
|
Khusrau | 29 May 2017 6:09 a.m. PST |
'Properly play tested'? I was part of a play test group that played collectively, hundreds if not thousands of games across a three year period. There were still questions being raised after release. You are dealing with people,some of whom, perversely, have an incentive to misinterpret the text to aid their chance of winning. In other writing, readers will simply infer meaning from context and move on. Not so with wargames rules. |
optional field | 03 Jun 2017 6:54 p.m. PST |
For my ¢ 2 d all the answers would seem to be better if phrased as "when needed, but not sooner than X." Beyond that I'd say that anything under 2 years should (in most cases) see the publisher offer the updates as a free download. |
|