"Cold War Gone Hot - Favorite Scenario Type (Tie-Breaker Round)" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Cold War Gone Hot - Favorite Scenario Type (Tie-Breaker Round) Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article How does coverbinding work?
Featured Profile Article The final installment of our ReaperCon report.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Frederick  | 27 Apr 2017 4:56 a.m. PST |
No preference for me – as long as I can roll T-62s into the Fulda Gap it's all good to me |
| J Womack 94 | 28 Apr 2017 8:55 a.m. PST |
How about Cold War Realities as understood by NATO during the Cold War? It's not fantasy, it's based on the actual intelligence assumptions of the time without the Monday morning quarterback. |
| Mako11 | 29 Apr 2017 4:34 a.m. PST |
Yea, looks like my preferred option got "nuked", which seems rather appropriate for the period. Agreed, Cold War "realities" as we believed them to be at the time, e.g. 3:1 – 5:1+ odds against NATO, and in favor of the communists, depending upon the weapons in play (tanks, IFVs, artillery, jets, etc., etc.), or troop types. |
| Martian Root Canal | 01 May 2017 9:24 a.m. PST |
J Womack 94 – We're referring to the actual scenario book, not the period. As author of that book, I divided the scenarios into the three buckets (what we thought in the West; what the reality of it was based on declassified WARPACT and Soviet documents; and 'Hollywood' scenarios). |
|
