"Warhammer: Which Edition?" Topic
7 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Warhammer: Which Edition? Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Workbench Article Scratch-builders often need basic wood shapes. Here is what is available inexpensively at the dollar store.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| The Beast Rampant | 26 Jul 2016 6:04 a.m. PST |
3rd. More refined than 2nd, more crunchy than 4th. Some of the high-level spells are the fantasy equivalent of A-bombs, but otherwise a pretty balanced and fun ruleset. |
| skippy0001 | 26 Jul 2016 7:01 a.m. PST |
|
| Weasel | 26 Jul 2016 7:32 a.m. PST |
3rd but with some of the more clunky maneuver bits filed off. I did like the edition that took magic back to dice instead of cards. 6th? |
| nazrat | 26 Jul 2016 7:33 a.m. PST |
Yes, that was the one, Weasel, and it was damn near perfect. Basic troops rules the battlefield and characters, though still powerful, could never win all by themselves. |
| The Beast Rampant | 26 Jul 2016 8:06 a.m. PST |
4th started the card spells & items. I DID like that bit. |
| The Beast Rampant | 26 Jul 2016 8:08 a.m. PST |
Basic troops rules the battlefield and characters, though still powerful, could never win all by themselves. Proper use of magic battle banners tipped that a bit. The only reason to take skaven plague monks was that sweet 100-point banner! |
| The Beast Rampant | 26 Jul 2016 8:12 a.m. PST |
The original Rogue Trader with second edition. I can personally vouch for the fact that a few RT shuriken catapults will seriously  up a Cadillac unit of chaos warriors. |
|
