Help support TMP


"From Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Return to the From Fort Moultrie to Fort Sumter Poll


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Showcase Article

GallopingJack Checks Out The Terrain Mat

Mal Wright Fezian goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting Lions

Continuing our 'animals' theme, Stronty Girl Fezian tackles a pair of lionesses.


Featured Profile Article

Is Wargaming in my Blood?

Will Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian find wargaming inspiration in his DNA results? Probably!


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


336 hits since 25 Mar 2015
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

redbanner414525 Mar 2015 5:08 a.m. PST

Everything provoked the South Carolinians. I'd say kinda' like today but I don't want to be DH'd.

John the Greater25 Mar 2015 5:56 a.m. PST

redbanner is right, the South Carolinians were already provoked. If Anderson has stayed at Ft. Moultrie he would have simply been overrun and there would have been many casualties.

As James Petigru, South Carolina's Attorney General, said: "South Carolina is too small for a republic and too large for an insane asylum."

Who asked this joker25 Mar 2015 6:31 a.m. PST

Like above, Anderson saved many lives in his command. Now the real question is, should the South have opened hostilities with the North knowing they were outnumbered something like 4-1 in manpower?

Mute Bystander25 Mar 2015 7:21 a.m. PST

Has anyone ever won when outnumbered more than 4:1 in the pre-ACW history?

Yes.

Were other reasons not to start this fight they ignored, misunderstood, or dismissed?

Yes.

Was Idealism, Cultural Naivete, and Ego driving the South's decision?

Yes.

No Opinion myself, but there was no "good" choice here for Anderson if my history reading is correct.

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP25 Mar 2015 9:36 a.m. PST

Major Anderson made the right decision given as noted he had no good choices – among other things, it forced the Confederates to take the first shot

RavenscraftCybernetics25 Mar 2015 10:20 a.m. PST

second-guessing historical figures and their decisions is the height of arrogance.

Weasel25 Mar 2015 3:45 p.m. PST

Regardless of which specific spark set off the war, it seemed that war was inevitable.

darthfozzywig25 Mar 2015 7:06 p.m. PST

second-guessing historical figures and their decisions is the height of arrogance.

And the heart of historical wargaming. :D

nazrat26 Mar 2015 8:28 a.m. PST

"second-guessing historical figures and their decisions is the height of arrogance."

So what, we aren't allowed to talk about what we think about historical actions because YOU say so? THAT seems like the actual height of arrogance.

Darth is absolutely correct!

Tom Bryant29 Mar 2015 6:34 p.m. PST

I'm not entirely sure that "the war was inevitable" Lincoln and many in the North knew full well that the right to secede was built in to the Constitution from the getgo (it would never have been ratified without it). Furthermore, Lincoln was not in the situation of initiating combat with the South as there were too many factions in the North that would not allow it. Also it meant that any overt hostile acts like a blockade were out of the question until the shooting started

All the South had to do was sit back and wait out the North. They could have ignored Sumter, forcing Lincoln to make the first hostile move.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.