Help support TMP


"Have You Gamed the Battle of Bladensburg?" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Return to the Have You Gamed the Battle of Bladensburg? Poll


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

3 Giant Succulents

Back to the plastic jungle…


Featured Profile Article

Cheap Wood Trays

Useful for dice trays or carrying painting supplies around.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


319 hits since 27 Apr 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Kent Reuber Supporting Member of TMP27 Apr 2016 8:46 a.m. PST

Worthington Games did a Bladensburg scenario in their "For Honor and Glory" boardgame (Hold the Line system). Miniatures could certainly be used.

Winston Smith27 Apr 2016 9:38 a.m. PST

We played it with ….. hold your hats ….. Empire V.
It was great fun.
Seriously.
Really.
No kidding!
grin

rmaker27 Apr 2016 10:40 a.m. PST

It's especially fun if the group has a loose cannon player to be James Madison.

Winston Smith27 Apr 2016 11:44 a.m. PST

We did. grin
Units were randomly re-deployed.
But it wasn't just Madison interfering. Oh no…..

Personal logo The Virtual Armchair General Sponsoring Member of TMP28 Apr 2016 10:39 a.m. PST

Perhaps the lowest moment in US Military History. Some honor due to a unit of US Sailors who were at least willing to mix it up with a very professional, picked British force.

Any US Army battle that is immediately followed by the burning of Washington has got to be considered a "major defeat," but this action is so humiliating it is never mentioned in our school histories.

Also a stinging rebuke to Jeffersonian ideas of "Citizen Soldiers," and the value of National Defense based on Militia. This battle, and the war generally, is proof of the danger of believing one's own myths, specifically of how the US won the Revolutionary War--a myth still firmly grounded in the minds of most Americans (many war gamers to the contrary).

If you're not familiar with this abortion of a "Battle," look at least at Robert Leckie's account in his two volume "The Wars of America," though more recent works must cover it as well.

And for those who don't think Congreve Rockets were militarily effective, or that only ignorant savages could be impressed by them, think again.

Though in this case, "ignorant savages" might simply have a broader application.

Bladensburg: So ridiculous, it has become the "crazy aunt in the attic" of American History.

TVAG

(Yeah, I'm still bitter about it!)

Winston Smith29 Apr 2016 7:36 a.m. PST

You were there!

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP22 May 2016 5:15 p.m. PST

I fool with it now and then. Camden, too, and for much the same reason--because there's nothing wrong with the army that giving it a real commander won't cure, as witness Cowpens, Guilford and Godly Wood. I won't say generals aren't sometimes let down by their troops, but a LOT of troops have been let down by their generals.

Use free deployment and a Cowpens/Guilford style defense--or, looked at another way, have the militia rested, in place and knowing what's expected of them--and it's a tough nut for the British to crack.

It's not a screwdriver's fault that it's a lousy hammer.

Pity about the timing, though. The burning of Washington was about a century and a half or so early.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.