Help support TMP


"Refights" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Return to the Refights Poll


Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Little Yellow Clamps

Need some low-pressure clamps?


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


438 hits since 30 May 2016
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

PzGeneral30 May 2016 5:15 a.m. PST

Only one. I have a Rorke's Drift set…..

And I'm trying to figure out an alternate Zulu attack plan….

Who asked this joker30 May 2016 6:27 a.m. PST

Often. Mine are close to the real thing but I usually don't get the numbers of troops exact. Close but not exact.

Yesthatphil30 May 2016 6:42 a.m. PST

Often: I believe the historical refight is the gold standard of wargaming. It isn't always practical, and more generic wargames are also quite useful to refine rules mechanisms and allow historically inspired armies to get a wide usage …

But in the end my wargaming is about exploring history through games – so closer to the real thing is better.

Additionally, as a military historian, I find wargame models and layouts very useful for presenting historical battles to the public (as miniature tableaux vivants) and running the battles through as wargames a very useful way of testing theories about battles where the accounts are less than complete.

Of course you get out of them what you put into them (so nobody is claiming it is an exact science)…

Phil
Ancients on the Move

Pictors Studio30 May 2016 7:47 a.m. PST

For about the last ten years I've mostly been doing historical refights with the occasional "what if?" game and some quick things here and there when I was excited about a period and didn't have the figures yet. But the goal is always to create the OOB for a particular battle and then fight it out when I'm doing historicals.

advocate30 May 2016 10:48 a.m. PST

PzGeneral, I suspect that having any plan would help.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP30 May 2016 4:08 p.m. PST

Right now I'm doing a re-fight of Jutland at !/2 ratio. Love re-fights!

Frederick Supporting Member of TMP31 May 2016 5:02 a.m. PST

Sometimes – one that I keep returning to is the Teutoberger Wald

John the Greater31 May 2016 7:48 a.m. PST

It's an interesting coincidence that this poll came out just after my group did an excellent re-fight of Stone's River (Murfreesboro). In case you are interested, the Confederates lost after a hard-fought action.

Old Contemptibles01 Jun 2016 2:42 p.m. PST

My preference is for historical scenarios or "refights" as oppose to hypothetical scenarios. But I do enjoy both. The hypothetical scenario needs to be in the right historical context. It needs to be plausible. It needs to make sense. But with everything else being equal, I will always choose the historical over the hypothetical.

legatushedlius04 Jun 2016 9:34 a.m. PST

When I collect armies I always do so based on a historical battle. Even if doing a skirmish I would find it difficult to field forces who weren't in the area at the time. I am more a historian than a gamer, I suppose.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.