"Optimum Width for 28mm Dungeon Corridors?" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Return to the Optimum Width for 28mm Dungeon Corridors? Poll
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
|
| Vigilant | 13 Dec 2018 9:44 a.m. PST |
|
| Spooner6 | 13 Dec 2018 9:52 a.m. PST |
I would normally say 2" but some of my figures have "Spillage" over the base edge so I went with 60mm to give a little extra room for figure placement. Though I could agree with VIgilant, 3 bases wide is also a good choice, especially if the group is more than 4 PC's.allows the group to run with 3 PC's up front. Chris |
| Mithmee | 14 Dec 2018 6:34 p.m. PST |
I am almost with Vigilant on this but I went with 4 inches, which would give room for 3-4 figures to fit across. |
robert piepenbrink  | 14 Dec 2018 7:13 p.m. PST |
This is our basing coming back to haunt us again. The standard D&D 10' wide 10' high corridor should let Gandalf, Aragorn, Gimli and Legolas walk side by side. But we put our miniatures on bases which are a scale 6' in diameter so we need a 4"/24' corridor to accommodate as many characters as a "real" 10' wide corridor. (Yes, I do it too. But it's surprising how many people don't work out that interiors for 1:1 combat have to be built overscale.) |
 Sgt Slag | 17 Dec 2018 12:35 p.m. PST |
They need clearance to wield their weapons?… I use 1" = 5 feet. Accurate? Realistic? Heck, no! But it is what was used in 1e AD&D, since 1979. I started playing in 1980, and we used it, and we liked it. Still do. "Realism? Sheesh!…" Cheers! |
|
begins to think about terrain for Team Yankee.