Help support TMP


POLL: Does TMP Need a Spell Checker?


343 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


Personal logo optional field Supporting Member of TMP writes:

I say yes, with the caveat that it shouldn't cost Bill anything, and should be installable with a minimum of fuss for him.


Back to the Homepage



1,778 hits since 5 May 2012
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
yes
97
28%
bar of chart
no
58
17%
bar of chart
er...
21
6%
bar of chart
not needed
61
18%
bar of chart
it won't help
52
15%
bar of chart
I don't need it
10
3%
bar of chart
spelling is over-rated
31
9%
bar of chart
other
5
1%
bar of chart
no opinion
8
2%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION

Dave Knight Supporting Member of TMP remarks...

This forum needs a spell checker.

(Poll options taken from this pre-poll discussion.)

yes
I can't function without one.
no
People who take part in this hooby should be able to spell properly.
er...
It already has one (and you know who you are).
not needed
Chances are pretty good that your web browser has one built-in (or has a plug-in to do it).
it won't help
An unexpected extra "spell checker" can be much more of a problem than a help.
I don't need it
After being taught by nuns, you can't help but become the ultimate spell checker!
spelling is over-rated
I can still read misspelled words - no doubt you can, too.
other
Explain in the comments section.
no opinion
I have no opinion on this question.