
POLL: What Makes for a Bad Convention Game (Round 1A)
714 votes were cast by total voters.
Back to POLLS home page
20thmaine writes: |
Yes – I appreciate a pretty game as much as the next wargamer, but very basic looking games can be great fun. If it's a good game – pacey, good scenario, fun players then the looks don't actually matter all that much. |
Back to the Homepage
|
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
VOTING RESULTS |
Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
Activation rules that mean your troops might never move | 91 | 13% |  |
Arbitrary, unfair referee | 86 | 12% |  |
Background of scenario is poorly explained or confusing | 10 | 1% |  |
Bad aesthetics | 17 | 2% |  |
Badly painted figures | 18 | 3% |  |
Battlefield too crowded/too many figures | 32 | 4% |  |
Boring terrain | 13 | 2% |  |
Cheaters | 90 | 13% |  |
Diorama game | 6 | 1% |  |
Drunk players | 42 | 6% |  |
Everything you try to do, the GM says no | 29 | 4% |  |
Fighting over post-game awards | 7 | 1% |  |
Game is advertised for 'all ages' | 5 | 1% |  |
Game is just 'move forward and roll dice' | 17 | 2% |  |
Game is just a dice-rolling contest | 26 | 4% |  |
Game is painfully slow | 88 | 12% |  |
Game is too big | 15 | 2% |  |
Gamemaster not familiar with the rules | 89 | 12% |  |
Games where units keep charging and never stop | 1 | 0% |  |
GM bias if you play 'the wrong way' | 27 | 4% |  |
other (explain) | 0 | 0% | |
none of these/no opinion | 5 | 1% |  |
|