|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 etotheipi  writes: |
I went no preference. It really depends on what the objective of the game is. What I don't like is games that appear to have facings because they feel it is more "realistic" and games that appear to not have them because it is "too complex". Plus, I am not a big fan of "pro basing" (invariably my scrub grass based Zulus end up in the dirt floor compound and my dry dirt based Brits end up falling back into the brush) for my own figures (I appreciate the art of it, though), so markings and other indicators don't bother me. |
Back to the Homepage
2,288 hits since 1 Mar 2012
©1994-2019 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
prefer facings | 157 | 42% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
prefer no facings | 89 | 24% | |
no preference | 49 | 13% | |
Depends on the genre of the game (fantasy, sci-fi, WWII, ect) | 65 | 17% | |
I don't play skirmish games | 16 | 4% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
CPBelt muses... In 1:1 skirmish games (not squad-based), do you prefer figures have facings (seeing only 180-degrees in front of themselves for example) or not have any facings (being able to see and shoot in all directions)? |
