|
advocate writes: |
I don't game in this period. As described, it seems pretty specific, and I wonder how much variation you could get if you stuck to purely historical. |
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
VOTING RESULTS | |||
Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
we play 100% historical battles | 1 | 1% | |
---|---|---|---|
90% historical/10% hypothetical | 2 | 2% | |
80% historical/20% hypothetical | 3 | 4% | |
70% historical/30% hypothetical | 1 | 1% | |
60% historical/40% hypothetical | 1 | 1% | |
50% historical/50% hypothetical | 11 | 13% | |
40% historical/60% hypothetical | 3 | 4% | |
30% historical/70% hypothetical | 3 | 4% | |
20% historical/80% hypothetical | 8 | 10% | |
10% historical/90% hypothetical | 6 | 7% | |
we play 100% hypothetical battles | 12 | 14% | |
other (explain) | 1 | 1% | |
none of these/no opinion | 7 | 8% | |
this is ridiculous | 0 | 0% | |
not my genre | 21 | 25% | |
not my cup of tea | 4 | 5% |
POLL IS CLOSED |
POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Field Marshal writes: Do you recreate historical battles, or do you game hypotheticals mixing up the units of different columns for a generic game? Same as is done with, say, Napoleonics, we game battles that are made from our collections, and occasionally a historical refight. Poll set up by Editor in Chief Bill , based on this pre-poll discussion. |