Help support TMP


POLL: What's Wrong with FoW?


1360 votes were cast by total voters.


Back to POLLS home page


unknown member writes:

Remember waiting for this rule set – was in beta version for years -tired of waiting for them to iron out the problems – Fire and Fury finally picked up the mantle and produced an excellent game, great web support and could use any scenario from SkirmishCampaigns. Liked this set much better. Seems like those that play FoW have fun and many are very well versed in history of WWII. The two DON'T have to be mutually exclusive.


Back to the Homepage



2,298 hits since 5 May 2011
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

The Membership System is temporarily offline for maintenance. It should be restored shortly.

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
All the books turned me off
80
6%
bar of chart
biased in favor of the Germans
49
4%
bar of chart
Fanboys
135
10%
bar of chart
I don't like the name
6
0%
bar of chart
Invincible heavy armor
63
5%
bar of chart
Lame logo
4
0%
bar of chart
needs armored vehicle lucky hit table
17
1%
bar of chart
Not enough depth
54
4%
bar of chart
Overly complex
9
1%
bar of chart
Overly simplistic
88
6%
bar of chart
Poor game system
84
6%
bar of chart
Rules are inconsistent
48
4%
bar of chart
the telescoping range thing
87
6%
bar of chart
Too colorful and glossy
4
0%
bar of chart
Too expensive
128
9%
bar of chart
Too many editions
97
7%
bar of chart
Too many special rules
113
8%
bar of chart
Too popular
11
1%
bar of chart
Too profitable
5
0%
bar of chart
Uses too many dice
13
1%
bar of chart
there's nothing wrong with FoW
79
6%
bar of chart
I don't play Flames of War
158
12%
bar of chart
no opinion
28
2%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION

unknown member asks...

What's wrong with Flames of War?

(Poll options taken from this pre-poll discussion.)