Help support TMP


POLL: Wargame Scenery - How Good?


125 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


Personal logo Sgt Slag Supporting Member of TMP writes:

USAFpilot: agree, completely. I take my entire approach one step further, though…

Am I playing a game, or a simulation? Honestly, I always try to play games, only. Simulations are too detailed, too complex, and far too tedious, for my personal tastes. I want action, and I want progressive results -- Sitzkrieg games bore me.

I'm an army painter: get them on the table before I die, so I can actually enjoy playing with them! Same thing with terrain: making it is fun, but it needs to be re-usable, versatile, and modular. That means it is less than realistic, but I can re-use it, re-deploy it into different configurations, in different game scenarios, without creating custom pieces, every time, for every game… Cheers!


Back to the Homepage



Areas of Interest

General

626 hits since 14 May 2018
©1994-2019 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
only in the grand style
3
2%
bar of chart
it's important to get the scenery as good as possible
75
60%
bar of chart
none of these/no opinion
1
1%
bar of chart
basic scenery will do
39
31%
bar of chart
other (explain)
7
6%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION

HammerHead writes:

Is it important to get the table scenery as good as possible?

Poll set up by Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian, based on this pre-poll discussion.