Help support TMP


POLL: Wargame Scenery - How Good?


125 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


Personal logo Sgt Slag Supporting Member of TMP writes:

USAFpilot: agree, completely. I take my entire approach one step further, though…

Am I playing a game, or a simulation? Honestly, I always try to play games, only. Simulations are too detailed, too complex, and far too tedious, for my personal tastes. I want action, and I want progressive results -- Sitzkrieg games bore me.

I'm an army painter: get them on the table before I die, so I can actually enjoy playing with them! Same thing with terrain: making it is fun, but it needs to be re-usable, versatile, and modular. That means it is less than realistic, but I can re-use it, re-deploy it into different configurations, in different game scenarios, without creating custom pieces, every time, for every game… Cheers!


Back to the Homepage



353 hits since 14 May 2018
©1994-2018 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
other (explain)
7
6%
bar of chart
none of these/no opinion
1
1%
bar of chart
it's important to get the scenery as good as possible
75
60%
bar of chart
only in the grand style
3
2%
bar of chart
basic scenery will do
39
31%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION

HammerHead Supporting Member of TMP writes:

Is it important to get the table scenery as good as possible?

Poll set up by Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian, based on this pre-poll discussion.