|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Piyan Glupak writes: |
I don't normally do it, but I did once to compair DBA 2.2 with DBMM 100 (DBMM played with small armies). I used my 2 Warring States Chinese armies. The outcomes were similar, but I preferred the DBA because the game was quicker, and, possibly because I was more familiar with the rules, seemed to flow better. |
Back to the Homepage
332 hits since 2 Nov 2019
©1994-2019 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes | 34 | 33% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
no | 24 | 24% | |
other (explain) | 1 | 1% | |
none of these/no opinion | 3 | 3% | |
this is ridiculous | 0 | 0% | |
not my genre | 0 | 0% | |
not my cup of tea | 0 | 0% | |
yes, but not lately | 12 | 12% | |
no, but I have thought about it | 19 | 19% | |
yes, to test/compare rulesets | 9 | 9% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Do you like to play the same battle, using different rulesets? Poll set up by |
, based on