|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dave Crowell writes: |
Where is the "both" option? I imagine as technology advances we will see further new innovations and developments in wargames design and mechanisms. For the most part though I think it is a matter of fashion. Single figure vs multi-base? Area of effect templates, including bounce sticks. Card draw activation. Buckets-o-Dice vs charts and tables with endless modifiers to a single die. I don't always know what the shiny new hotness is. I find rules I like and I play them. I still play the original Mayhem: Muskets and Mohawks, despite the rules now being on their second publishers and maybe fourth version. |
Back to the Homepage

Sometimes at a convention, you can be just dead lucky and find a real bargain.
364 hits since 28 Jan 2026
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
this is ridiculous | 9 | 10% | |
|---|---|---|---|
not my cup of tea | 0 | 0% | |
fashion | 42 | 48% | |
other (explain) | 7 | 8% | |
none of these/no opinion | 16 | 18% | |
progress | 14 | 16% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
robert piepenbrink Are miniatures rules a matter of progress, so that the "outdated" set has no more purpose than a WWII tank on a modern battlefield? Or are they more like hemlines and hats, where everything old is new again? (And what does one make of rules which are like US .50 cals and Maxim guns and seem to defy aging?) Poll set up by |