|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 mweaver  writes: |
I doubt you will be proved correct, alfritz. |
Back to the Homepage
1,331 hits since 7 Oct 2004
©1994-2010 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
this is a great idea | 6 | 3% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
no - publish everything at Black Gobbo | 10 | 5% | |
no - publish everything in White Dwarf | 25 | 13% | |
no - publish everything in both places | 19 | 10% | |
no opinion | 37 | 20% | |
don't subscribe to White Dwarf | 47 | 25% | |
no - publish everything in either but not both | 44 | 23% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
In a recent issue of the U.S. edition of White Dwarf magazine, it was announced that for a particular Warhammer campaign, the players' materials would be published online at the Black Gobbo website, while the GM's packet was included in White Dwarf as an article. How do you feel about splitting campaign articles? |
