Help support TMP


POLL: Defining Objectionable


147 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


jowady writes:

TMP is a "web magazine for miniature wargamers" not figure collectors

Interesting, I do very little "wargaming" with the miniatures I buy and paint. I make dioramas and simply work on most for fun. Nice to know that I and folks like me are not wanted here.


Back to the Homepage



639 hits since 12 Feb 2017
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
no opinion
16
11%
bar of chart
this post is not objectionable
84
57%
bar of chart
this post is objectionable
42
29%
bar of chart
other (explain)
5
3%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION
This is a link to a post made to TMP, featuring a 1:32nd scale female nude. One of our readers complains:
OBJECTIONABLE PICTURE – clearly not wargaming related or a wargaming diorama
Now, it is true that our FAQ states that nude photos…
…must be hobby related, such as a wargaming model or diorama.
You could possibly argue that the model is 1:32nd scale (a wargaming scale), or that the rule should be amended to allow art figures which are not pornographic. What do you think?

Poll set up by Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian, based on this pre-poll discussion.