|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Phrodon writes: |
"What is the problem with folded and stapled? The ones I have used over the years have stood up for me." Depending on the size of the game, that might not work. Another good option though. >> Sadly, rules are so undervalued. People will easily spend $10 USD on figures, but balk and complain about a $10 USD rulebook that took years to play test, write, and publish. Go figure (hee hee). |
Back to the Homepage
1,712 hits since 23 May 2006
©1994-2010 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
Perfect bound (flat, gum-backed spine) | 67 | 19% | |
|---|---|---|---|
Spiral bound | 158 | 45% | |
Saddle (folded point at the spine) | 13 | 4% | |
Folded and stapled | 20 | 6% | |
Loose-leaf with holes punched | 46 | 13% | |
Electronic copy | 16 | 5% | |
Whatever is cheapest | 10 | 3% | |
no preference | 20 | 6% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
What type of binding do you prefer for wargame rules? |