|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Charlie 12 writes: |
Rallynow makes a good point. Out here on the Left Coast, traveling 2-3 hours is nothing (my girlfriend and I regularly shoot up to LA for a day. And that's 2 hours of driving). For a con, 6 hours is not outside the limit at all (of course, it would nice if there were some decent cons WITHIN 6 hours of driving…). |
Back to the Homepage
1,443 hits since 10 Jan 2015
©1994-2019 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
1 hour | 10 | 8% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
2 hours | 24 | 19% | |
3 hours | 27 | 21% | |
4 hours | 25 | 20% | |
5 hours | 4 | 3% | |
6 hours | 10 | 8% | |
7 hours | 0 | 0% | |
8 hours | 9 | 7% | |
9 hours | 1 | 1% | |
10 hours | 4 | 3% | |
11 hours | 0 | 0% | |
12 hours or more | 7 | 6% | |
no opinion | 6 | 5% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
LHMGKodiak asks: How many hours of your time are you willing to invest in travel (method doesnt matter, planes, trains or automobiles) to go to a medium con (i.e., HMGS, couple of thousand people)? Poll set up by |
, based on