|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| batesmotel34 writes: |
A significant problem with the pre-discusssion of this topic is that the person planning to run the campaign didn't specify what level of command they wanted for the land campaign. A platoon vs battalion vs divsion level commands may all be good rules in general but not useful for the campaign. If a platoon level system works, Chain of Command with it's recent Far East supplement to provide additional support in the Pacific would be my choice. The Saipan 1944 psc campaign could provide lot more ideas and some ideas for how to adopt CoC to a more general campaign. |
Back to the Homepage
Rating: 
525 hits since 6 Jul 2025
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
Battlefront: WWII | 10 | 6% |  |
|---|---|---|---|
Battlegroup | 6 | 4% | |
Blitzkrieg Commander | 4 | 2% | |
Chain of Command | 17 | 10% | |
Combat Patrol | 7 | 4% | |
Crossfire | 17 | 10% | |
Fireball Forward! | 4 | 2% | |
Flames of War | 10 | 6% | |
FUBAR | 5 | 3% | |
I Ain't Been Shot, Mum! | 11 | 6% | |
O Group | 6 | 4% | |
One-Hour Skirmish Wargames | 9 | 5% | |
Rapid Fire | 10 | 6% | |
Rapid Fire Reloaded | 8 | 5% | |
Spearhead | 9 | 5% | |
all of the above | 2 | 1% | |
other (explain) | 3 | 2% | |
none of these/no opinion | 16 | 9% | |
this is ridiculous | 0 | 0% | |
not my genre | 12 | 7% | |
not my cup of tea | 5 | 3% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
dogtail I am looking for a rulesystem to regame the War in the Pacific. I am quite familiar with FoW V1 and 2, but I dislike V4. Would Battlegroup be a fitting alternative? Poll set up by |
, based on