Help support TMP


POLL: Going 'Alexandrian' in Armati


90 votes were cast.


Back to POLLS home page


Scorpio writes:

Someone with more free time than I should figure out how many polls we have had asking for our opinions on the opinions someone else wrote for Slingshot.


Back to the Homepage



531 hits since 5 Mar 2017
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?

VOTING RESULTS
AnswerVotes%Chart
other (explain)
2
2%
bar of chart
I agree, and I think it is a problem
5
6%
bar of chart
I disagree
3
3%
bar of chart
never heard of Armati
4
4%
bar of chart
no opinion
10
11%
bar of chart
not familiar with Armati
36
40%
bar of chart
I agree, but I do not think it is a problem
30
33%
bar of chart
POLL IS CLOSED
POLL DESCRIPTION
Writing in Slingshot 271, Mark Fry laments…
…it's all too common for an Armati ancient tabletop commander to go for the "Alexandrian option" of engaging his opponent frontally in the center with infantry, whilst attempting to break off a single cavalry unit to sweep in on the flank or rear of his opponent's own infantry center and destroy it with a devastating flank charge.
Do you agree, and if so, is it a problem?

Poll set up by Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian, based on this pre-poll discussion.