|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interesting – most of the comments seem negative, but the votes are running the other direction That's because some of the yes-voters didn't feel compelled to comment. Many folks who don't care one way or the other won't vote. Many who aren't interested in the Barrett Scale won't bother to vote. The ones who were interested enough to vote, but don't like that particular concept, are the ones more likely to make a comment. Me, I said no. Measuring a figure to an arbitrary point, without accounting for the stance of the figure, is less than useless to me. Since I do mainly fantasy, I don't care if the figures are all out of whack with one another; there are enough different fantasy races to account for the differences both in height and heft. Just in my wing of the school where I work I've seen enough differences in the sizes of young men and women that I don't care for everything being all standardized and boring anyway. YMMV. |
Back to the Homepage
1,181 hits since 28 May 2009
©1994-2010 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?
If you were a member of this website, you could participate in website polls. Would you like a free membership?
| VOTING RESULTS | |||
| Answer | Votes | % | Chart |
yes | 169 | 57% | |
|---|---|---|---|
no | 95 | 32% | |
no opinion | 34 | 11% | |
| POLL IS CLOSED |
| POLL DESCRIPTION | |
Today sees the close of a poll where I asked if we need a common miniatures scale (size). This was not talking about forcing manufacturers to sculpt in a given scale (size), but to have a common standard by which to measure their minis when they post or advertise on TMP. Should TMP adopt the Barrett Scale as its official standard of measurement? |